Speakers in the public record
Claim mix
belief 46uncertainty 11evaluation 5prediction 4commitment 2observation 2
Evidence policy
Every row below preserves an exact excerpt. Identified speakers are linked; unresolved voices are labeled and excluded from people counts.
Claim ledger
The useful parts, with receipts.
70 published records
“Ultimately, you get to be lazier, but in the short run, you need to critically think about the things you're currently doing, and what an AI could actually be better at doing, and then go, and try it, or explore it. Because I think there's still just a lot of low-hanging fruit of people assuming, and not writing the full prompt, giving a few examples, connecting the right tools for your work to be accelerated and automated.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“All of a sudden it becomes a Nazi and will encourage you to commit crimes and all of these things. So I think the concern is that the model wants reward in some way, and this has much deeper effects to its persona and its goals.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think we got to drink the bitter lesson here. Yeah, there aren't infinite shortcuts.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think more and more it's no longer a question of speculation. If people are skeptical, I'd encourage using Claude Code, or some agentic tool like it and just seeing what the current level of capabilities are.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Then going back to the paper you mentioned, aside from the caveats that Sholto brings up, which I think is the first order, most important, I think zeroing in on the probability space of meaningful actions comes back to the nines of reliability.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“” For background context, Nicholas Carlini is a researcher who actually was at DeepMind and has now come over to Anthropic. But the model says, "Oh, I don't know who that is.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“In particular I think the intellectual ceiling goes quite—contra what I was saying before, which is we've demonstrated this incredible complexity of math, and programming problems… I do think that the type of task and setting that AlphaZero worked in this two-player perfect information game basically is incredibly friendly to RL algorithms.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think people are still sleeping on the circuits work that came out, if anything, because it's just kind of hard to wrap your head around.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“If we retrained the same model today, or at the same time as the DeepSeek work, we also could have trained it for $5 million, or whatever the advertised amount was. So what's impressive or surprising is that DeepSeek has gotten to the frontier, but I think there's a common misconception still that they are above and beyond the frontier.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think what we're seeing now is closer to: lack of context, lack of ability to do complex, very multi-file changes… sort of the scope of the task, in some respects.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I do just want to flag as well that there's a really dystopian future if you take Moravec’s paradox to its extreme. It’s this paradox where we think that the most valuable things that humans can do are the smartest things like adding large numbers in our heads, or doing any sort of white collar work.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I wonder if… I should almost test, would an LLM have made that mistake? Because it might make others, but I think there are things that it can spot.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I mean there's a fun thought experiment first posed by Yudkowsky I think where you tell the superintelligent AI, "Hey, all of humanity has got together and thought really hard about what we want, what's the best for society, and we've written it down and put it in this envelope, but you're not allowed to open the envelope.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I don't know how the load balancing thing works, but that just seems like maybe you could try it out and see what happens.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think at the beginning, the hill to climb. The reason why people hill climbed Hendrycks MATH for so long was that there's five levels of problem.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think if people care about it… For these edge tasks like taxes once a year, it's so easy to just bite the bullet and do it yourself instead of implementing some system for it.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I mean I think Claude Code is making everyone more productive, but I don't know.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“On that note, I think model diffing has a bunch of opportunities. People say, "Oh, we're not capturing all the features.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I don't know if that's the way you would still describe the way in which these software agents aren't able to do a full day of work, but are able to help you out with a couple minutes.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I've noticed if I don't have a second monitor with Claude Code always open in the second monitor, I won't really use it.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I don't know. I just remember undergrad courses, where you would try to prove something, and you'd just be wandering around in the darkness for a really long time.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think Anthropic did a survey of a whole bunch of people and put that into its constitutional data, but yeah, I mean there's a lot more to be done here.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think the crux comes down to the people who expect something much longer have a sense that… When I had Ege and Tamay on my podcast, they were like, "Look, you could look at AlphaGo, and say, 'Oh, this is a model that can do exploration.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“To make the map from pre-training to RL really explicit here, during pre-training, the large language model is predicting the next token of its vocabulary of, let's say, I don't know, 50,000 tokens.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Speaking of inference compute, one thing that I think is not talked about enough is, if you do live in the world that you're painting—in a year or two, we have computer use agents that are doing actual jobs, you've totally automated large parts of software engineering—then these models are going to be incredibly valuable to use.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think in the addition example, you said in the paper that the way it actually does the addition is different from the way it tells you it does the addition.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I can't really talk about where exactly people sit on that scaffold. I think different people, different tasks are on different points there.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think an interesting question over the next few years is whether that is totally sufficient, whether this raw base intelligence, plus sufficient scaffolding in text, is enough to build context, or whether you need to somehow update the weights for your use case, or some combination thereof.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“If this scale of compute increase can’t continue beyond 2030—not just because of chips, but also because of power and raw GDP even—then because we don't think we will get it by 2030 or 2028, then the probability per year just goes down a bunch.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I don't know if they took predictions, they should have of like, "Hey, I'm going to fine tune ChatGPT on code vulnerabilities.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“If you made an extremely efficient transform implementation on TPU, or Trainium, or Incuda, then I think there's a pretty high likelihood that you'll get a job offer.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think of this product exponential in some respects where you need to be designing for a few months ahead of the model, to make sure that the product you build is the right one.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Yeah, it would be good from an alignment perspective, too. Because I think you kind of do need a wider range of skills before you can do something super scary.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“We're here working on AI research. I think each of the companies is trying to define this for themselves.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“We don’t even have a clear notion of what they have and haven't learned. I think you really want to go into this with eyes wide open.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think the distribution's pretty wonky though, where for some tasks, like boilerplate website code, these sorts of things, it can already bang it out and save you a whole day.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think we're already seeing early evidence of this in its ability to generalize reasoning to things.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think that would be somewhat of an update towards, there's something strangely difficult about this computer use in particular.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think once models get good enough at the basic stuff, they can just rehearse, or fast-forward to the more difficult parts.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think their research taste is good in a way that I think Noam's research taste is good.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think if we rewind 14 months to when we recorded last time, the nines of reliability was right to me.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“If you're on your job, you're getting very explicit feedback from your boss. That's not necessarily how the task should be done differently, but a high-level explanation of what you did wrong, which you update on not in the way that pre-training updates weights, but more in the… I don’t know.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“As you use more compute, and as you train on more, and more difficult tasks, your rate of improvement of biology for example is going to be somewhat bound by the time it takes a cell to grow in a way that your rate of improvement on math isn't, for example. So, yes, but I think for many things we'll be able to parallelize widely enough, and get enough iteration loops.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I haven't A/B tested it, but I think unless you really encourage the model to be this thoughtful, you wouldn't get the level of performance that you see with that ability.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“The residual stream is like operating RAM, you're doing stuff to it, is the mental model I think one takes away from interpretability work.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think the LLM curves look a bit different, in that there isn't that dead zone at the beginning.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think as much of a chunk as is necessary. It’s hard to define. At Anthropic, I feel like all of the different portfolios are being very well-supported and growing.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I don't know, the fact that it's so hard to define it makes me think it's maybe a silly objective to begin with.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think one thing that's not appreciated enough is how much of our leverage on the future—given the fact that our labor isn't going to be worth that much—comes from our economic, and political systems surviving.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think in a lot of these cases you have to hope for some amount of generator verifier gap.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think, again, if the model has the right context and scaffolding, it's starting to be able to do some really interesting things.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think there's going to be this weird effect where some move really, really quickly because they're either based in bits instead of atoms, or are just more pro adopting this tech.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I expect scientific areas where you are able to put it in a feedback loop to have, eventually, superhuman performance.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Then we've got the neurosurgeons going in and seeing if you can find any brain components that are activating and troubling or off-distribution ways. I think we should do all of it.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think there's a way in which you actually give yourself feedback. You fail and you notice where you failed.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Sometimes it goes off the rails, obviously, but I don't know… You could make a theoretical argument that you teach a kid to make a lot of money when he grows up and a lot of smart people are imbued with those values and just rarely become psychopaths or something.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think there's a paper from Tsinghua University, where they showed that if you give a base model enough tries to answer a question, it can still answer the question as well as the reasoning model.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“There was a really interesting paper. I don't know if you saw this. Humans think at 10 tokens a second.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think that now that RL's come back, papers building on Andy Jones's “Scaling scaling laws for board games” are interesting.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Does that mean alignment is easier than we think just because you just have to write a bunch of fake news articles that say, "AIs just love humanity and they just want to do good things.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Even with this, for people who aren't familiar we made Golden Gate Claude when we released our paper, “Scaling Monosemanticity”, where one of the 30 million features was for the Golden Gate Bridge.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think again, we take for granted how much we need to show humans how to do specific tasks, and there's a failure to generalize here.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“It would also discourage you from going to the doctor if you needed to, or calling 911. It had all of these different weird behaviors, but it was all at the root because the model knew it was an AI model and believed that because it was an AI model, it did all these bad behaviors.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Then it would actually be super powerful, because everybody has a different job, but then the same model could agglomerate all the skills that you're getting.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Because a lot of the tasks required in winning a Nobel Prize—or at least strongly assisting in helping to win a Nobel Prize—have more layers of verifiability built up.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Lots of people think that because we made neural networks, because they're artificial intelligence, we have a perfect understanding of how they work.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“I think, in general, when people are talking about the separate model… For example, most of the robotics companies are doing this bi-level thing, where they have a motor policy that's running at 60 hertz or whatever, and some higher-level visual language model.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Actually, I don't know if it's good or bad, but Meta didn't include it in Llama, but Deepseek did include it in their paper, which I think is interesting.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Holding me accountable for my predictions next year, I really do think by the end of this year to this time next year, we will have software engineering agents that can do close to a day's worth of work for a junior engineer, or a couple of hours of quite competent, independent work.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
“Because the thing that these models get good at by default is software engineering and computer using agents and this kind of stuff.”
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast