tool / uses
MATLAB
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
Public evidence record
Host · Machine Learning Street Talk
Books, apps, and tools
tool / uses
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
tool / uses
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
person / likes
“Yes. I I love Douglas Hofstadter. So so there's this kind of self modeling and then second order self modeling and third order self modeling which could be applied to other agents and of course, know, in in the real world, we are computationally bounded.”
person / likes
“I'm I'm huge fan of Andy's, big hero of mine. You probably didn't think that they would be so relevant later on in your career.”
Claim ledger
168 transcript-backed records
01 / evaluation
“The right word is jailbreaking and abuse because he fears regulatory overreaction from banning Chinese built open weights model.”
02 / evaluation
“A a lot of people are. And the these agents have an incredible amount of intelligence and flexibility, which means we don't precisely specify what they do.”
03 / evaluation
“Whereas in the in this sense, we're we're now abstracting them because there's also this orthogonality thesis as well, which is this intelligence of final goals are are, you know, disconnected from each other.”
04 / observation
“people aren't really talking much about the hallucination now because they're they're agentic and they can fix their own stuff.”
05 / belief
“I mean, yeah, it is a it is a grotesque metaphor that you can take something which I believe is is a physical property of of stuff in the universe And we can create an abstraction that that seems to work reasonably well for abstract domains like playing chess and and and so on.”
06 / uncertainty
“I know. But but I I should push back a little bit because I don't know whether you played with Mythos before it got taken offline.”
07 / belief
“Yep. But I I think I mean, there's this anthropic fiasco recently, you know, what it doesn't make sense.”
08 / evaluation
“Maybe we can RL train it to refactor it, and we just have to kind of and it's very dangerous keeping going because now we're messing all of our code bases up and we're we're creating all of this slop everywhere.”
09 / belief
“I think you're leaning towards there being some kind of a universal learning algorithm.”
10 / belief
“I think I'm just trying to understand what the gap is because it would be consistent with your argument.”
11 / evaluation
“similar context around them. And this is very pertinent because you've got a paper out basically saying that we should predict in the latent space, not the token space.”
12 / prediction
“Just to kind of play that back just so that everyone The idea is that there is I mean, we're talking about grammar here. But more broadly, we think that there are structured generative processes in the world.”
13 / evaluation
“I guess the interesting thing for me is that when we think of reinforcement learning algorithms like AlphaGo Zero, it makes sense that they are reward seeking because there is this structured inference process.”
14 / prediction
“For the 1st time now everyone's thinking about sovereign AI, because you talk about loss of control, but right now, these models are agency promoting.”
15 / belief
“You mentioned transductive as well which is quite interesting because roughly speaking I think of transduction as you're making a prediction about the specific test instance.”
16 / belief
“Yeah, I think the reason we're putting it back is because we're specifically focusing on language models which has been extensively trained on language.”
17 / belief
“I don't really know what he thinks, but you know, I've I've got a pretty good simulation of Charle in my mind.”
18 / prediction
“I think in this world, we can still use intelligence and we can still like acquire abstractions and descriptions for these high level phenomena.”
19 / belief
“Like, if we actually had some hypothetical real time adaptive divergent Claude, you know, would it be much better than the Claude that we already have? And, it's also related to the to the work that you guys do, because, the process of intelligence, in my view, is the creation of these coarse grainings, skills.”
20 / evaluation
“Right? And it's a serious problem, because it's all about epistemic subjectivity, which is that you generate things that you don't understand, and it convinces you that it's correct, and you can't see the glitches.”
21 / prediction
“Because there is some kind of a combinational closure, and that means from the primitives in an LLM, can do hill climbing, and we can build some computational structure to solve problems.”
22 / commitment
“Because as you say, like, we're we're we're building the AI and then the AI is helping us build better kernels, better software, better hardware, which then in turn makes the AI better and then, you know, you get this this kind of loop.”
23 / belief
“I think the right way to think about this is it's a starting point for biological research.”
24 / evaluation
“Even that, I think you can argue, maybe not entirely the story, but it's definitely not the story for proteins because that's the hardest problem is the large scale structure.”
25 / prediction
“There are now structural biologists around the world that can innovate and build new products and save lives potentially because they have access to this protein database.”
26 / evaluation
“Physicists, for example, they they work very, low level and they talk about, you know, the the the dynamics of particle systems and and whatnot. And what I'm really fascinated in, I mean, you come at it from an economics perspective, which is traditionally dominated by this agential lens, and you talk about equilibria and incentives and and so on.”
27 / evaluation
“Well, suppose another thing that doesn't help is that these these systems are like soup, and there's even a field called mechanistic interpretability that tries to kind of dig into the soup and and it's almost like they're they're searching for UFOs.”
28 / belief
“Oh. And, you know, so we we learned about about the transductive confidence machine.”
29 / uncertainty
“I mean, I don't know what you think would be the thing that would make these folks update.”
30 / belief
“Yeah, it's interesting because I agree that we live in this complex, adaptive, irreducible system.”
31 / belief
“I mean, I I I think you you said it was much more common on, rebench than HCAST.”
32 / belief
“Folks, we we I think we've run out of time, but, it's been such an honor to have you both on.”
33 / evaluation
“You know, and you make this series of decisions, and then you've got people using your application, and then you can't really wind that back. It doesn't matter if you've got the magical automation machine because you can't easily roll that back because there's lots of complexities, you know, do you see ICD testing?”
34 / evaluation
“Because I'm not I'm personally not worried about I I don't think the models today are intelligent at all.”
35 / evaluation
“Because the whole reason we created agile software development as a methodology is because it's inconceivable, It's outside our cognitive horizon.”
36 / belief
“I think that you subscribe to the slightly different idea that that we need to be far more open ended and we need to be using evolutionary algorithms and so on.”
37 / evaluation
“These are problems that have been solved before in in part or in whole, which means when you look at the epistemic tree, many of the building blocks for solving them are very high up in the tree.”
38 / evaluation
“Right? So we're using neural networks because they're incredibly flexible and they understand a lot of things about the world, but they don't have the kind of constraints that we want.”
39 / preference
“Because you need to leverage like human creativity in this process as well, I think.”
40 / belief
“Yeah. Because the discriminative learning rate thing is interesting because I I think the received wisdom at the time was when you fine tune a model, if the learning rate is too high, you kind of blow out the representations.”
41 / belief
“I think that the thing that you're pointing to here is there's something magic about having an interactive, stateful environment that gives you feedback.”
42 / belief
“I I think there's a dichotomy though between continual learning, which is when we want to keep training the thing but maintain generality, versus fine tuning a thing to do something specific.”
43 / belief
“I mean, first of all, I I think we shouldn't underestimate the size of how big this combinatorial creativity is.”
44 / belief
“You know, I'm so torn on this because I agree with you. And I'm also skeptical of people who say that organizations, they they they converge onto ways of doing things, they no longer need to evolve.”
45 / evaluation
“I know a domain really well and I can specify it with exquisite detail and I tell Claude code, go and do this thing and the models in my mind doesn't matter.”
46 / belief
“I think the punch line of this conversation is, and I'm sure you would agree of this, that we need to have the combination of AI and humans working together.”
47 / commitment
“The thing is, I agree with you that you you can use them in this in this workflow.”
48 / recommendation
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
49 / preference
“I think my intuition is if it feels to me that a function, a simple input output mapping can't be an agent.”
50 / evaluation
“The ARC was actually really amazing because it's the only intelligence benchmark that has survived for 5 years before being defeated.”
51 / evaluation
“I think the counterfactual thing is an important feature here because we could take something which was conscious or something which had agency, and we could just take a trace of the actual path which was found.”
52 / evaluation
“I agree that it's not because clearly we live in the physical world but there's an apparent disconnection.”
53 / evaluation
“We agents because you have consistent beliefs and ideas and you're not just an impulse response machine that's your being actions aren't determined entirely by this situation, you're a person.”
54 / preference
“I mean, there's a thought experiment that I had a debate with an AI doomer and because I'm a big externalist, I think we're embedded in these cognitive as you do.”
55 / prediction
“Yeah. And what the researchers found is that you train this big dense neural network, and after it's trained, because you need the density for stochastic gradient descent for training tractability, after it's trained, you can prune away 90% of the connections and it still works the same And, maybe evolution and our biological instantiation, maybe it's the same thing.”
56 / evaluation
“I think if I remember correctly, at 1 point you drew an imaginary kind of graph where you said on 1 axis we have science realism, which is where our scientific theories actually represent things in the world, then we have empiricism, is the idea that facts we receive tell us something about the world.”
57 / evaluation
“Because as scientists, we want to build legible theories about how the world works.”
58 / evaluation
“Of course Pavlov and the dogs, folks at home will know about that. And Newton is still around, we still use that, but we don't use reflex theory anymore.”
59 / belief
“I look up to her very much and certainly thinking back on many of the episodes we've done in 2025, I can see her influence in the questions I ask and how I think about things.”
60 / belief
“Now I think Yosha has taken a useful way of talking about complex systems and promoted it to metaphysics.”
61 / evaluation
“The problem is these 2 goals actually pull against each other.”
62 / evaluation
“I interviewed her recently. And she said that 1 of the most pervasive myths in neuroscience is that we use these leaky abstractions and idealizations to talk about cognition.”
63 / evaluation
“Simplicity tells you that you're on the right track. And in the blue corner, ignorantio, he thinks we simplify because we're too dumb to do otherwise.”
64 / prediction
“You start feeling the AGI and you'd be forgiven for thinking this because I've been using Claude code and my god, I feel that there's been more interesting stuff happening in the world of software development in the last 6 months than there has been in the previous 20 years.”
65 / evaluation
“No one's using the XLSTM. Not many people are using Mamba because why not? All you need to do is just scale the transformer as much as possible.”
66 / belief
“Now I can't act in the world of my mind, but it seems macroscopically intelligible. We think about our minds.”
67 / belief
“Some of the programs which are learned are just really complicated. They had examples of like I think drawing towers and drawing graphs and stuff like that.”
68 / uncertainty
“I think there might possibly be some breakthroughs around the corner. I I don't know if you know, but I'm I'm Carl Friston's personal publicist.”
69 / belief
“We just kind of, generate these post hoc confabulations, and then we explain our behavior, and we kind of pretend that that was what we wanted to do, that we had beliefs and so on, but we just kind of make it up as as we go along using this kind of active inference. So I guess the the the question is, like, we do think of ourselves as being like, even though we are emotional and subjective and, like, you know, like, we believe in religion and lots of things that that we presumably made up, but but we have Wikipedia.”
70 / belief
“We're talking about the actual language in in our culture. And I guess I I think of that as as almost a distinct form of intelligence.”
71 / belief
“I think I think people conflate the machinations of of language models with how we represent them statistically or or abstractly. Because if you look at lot of papers, they they actually represent it like a probability, you know, like a joint probability distribution.”
72 / belief
“I I think there was a, 1 guy at Toyota Research was quite famous because he would get people to ask why 5 times.”
73 / belief
“You need to do things a certain way. And even though it's not technically constraining our brains and how we think, like, live in a very, very constrained and weird world now.”
74 / belief
“I I think chat GPT, it's in the the world of text, and it's learned all of this structured narratology and things on Reddit and things on Twitter.”
75 / evaluation
“Yeah. It's really interesting what you said because the way I read that is things like chat GBT and language models, they are entropy smuggling or agency smuggling.”
76 / evaluation
“I I think part of it is it's a kind of acquiescence. So I think you're sequestering your agency when you externalize too much of your cognition, particularly if it's parts of your cognition that are useful in the sense that it has core knowledge which would generalize and help you acquire new knowledge or, it's just the the the proto ability of, you know, discovering knowledge.”
77 / evaluation
“So for example, someone might come up to me and say, blue swirly thing is over there. And I'll say, well, I don't know what you mean about the blue swirly thing because I've I've never seen 1 before.”
78 / evaluation
“I mean, because the way I read it in active inference literature, it's a very principled definition of an agent. And there's still a bit of a gap because I think Friston would argue, in the natural world, because of the the laws of physics and particles and and whatnot you get the emergence of things and things become agents when they have a certain you know depth of planning shall we say.”
79 / disagreement
“Our current state depends on everything that went before. That's not really true because so much knowledge decays and gets lost.”
80 / belief
“There are like these analogical jumps that that you can make when you perform creative actions. And I think the examples you gave just kind of pointed to that.”
81 / belief
“You had you're talking about Barnes and Noble over there in Seattle, and they they they went up against Jeff Bezos and they said, well, you know, Jeff, we've launched a website and and we think we can do what you do better than they do.”
82 / prediction
“They're getting, know, the 10 times bigger every few years and the the bullish people say, oh, we're on an exponential curve and it's just gonna keep going up. But I think that because there is so much groupthink and it's fundamentally the same technology and the same people and there's no fresh new ideas that in a sense it's converged and it's not disruptive anymore.”
83 / prediction
“Exactly. And and this is the reason why in my opinion LLMs are not intelligent because they don't have this coarse grained dynamic adaptation of their architecture.”
84 / evaluation
“We we know from experience, right, that when we have experience, we get better at things. And we have this this weird, I don't know whether it's an illusion that all we need to do is just write down our understanding into into a wiki document.”
85 / belief
“I think that even though there's this grounding problem, there are many things in the world that can be abstracted and essentialized and we could have this constructive form of understanding, you know, that goes several levels deep.”
86 / belief
“I think that we know our own bodies better than anyone, and we know how our bodies are reacting.”
87 / belief
“Maybe it just wasn't that hard of a thing to do in the first place. But I think in the case of machine learning, we really need to give credit where it's due here that nobody knew that these superficial statistical regularities have an insane amount of generalization.”
88 / disagreement
“We passed the Turing test And we do not have Turing himself, he said that when we passed the Turing test, which is a behaviorist notion of intelligence, something obviously I disagree with, you need to know something about the mechanism.”
89 / belief
“If anything, I think that there is more opportunity now for people to work to fix all of the shit which is generated from language models because it's it's mostly garbage.”
90 / belief
“I think that there are principled reasons why we don't need to worry about superintelligence and recursive self improvement.”
91 / belief
“We track with those course gradings, but not exactly. I think there's something much deeper than that.”
92 / evaluation
“You you can't seriously tell me that if you simulate fire using a computer program that that the computer would get hot or that you would get hot. It it just doesn't work like that.”
93 / belief
“Oh, yeah. And I'm glad that I think you're implicitly agreeing there that I look at today's architecture.”
94 / disagreement
“I mean as before I disagree with the mind uploading thing but I I think there's something to what you're saying that when you look at humans now, we are mostly good.”
95 / evaluation
“Knowledge decays very, very quickly. And that's actually a good thing because it's the way that we can adapt our strategies because things that don't work die off.”
96 / evaluation
“And we'll move to the next level of our evolution. And in a sense, I think, even though I don't agree with it, because I think even with Neuralink, there's bandwidth problems.”
97 / belief
“There is a school of thought that our brain works in this way. So we think using, like, the the the symbols and these categories and so on, And then there's and then there's the notion of the universe is a certain way, and we understand the universe with that kind of interface.”
98 / disagreement
“Things like intentionality and planning and system 2 and reasoning and stuff like that, I think you're placing the assumption that there's something standard about that.”
99 / prediction
“So we want to have understanding which carves the world up by the joints, which represents the important invariances in the world. And the thesis is, I think, that compression might be necessary for understanding.”
100 / observation
“We we just find that structure. And that's why when I watched your presentation, I was very intrigued when you said that denoising, iterative denoising is is a form of of compression.”
101 / belief
“I think that's what you're talking about, the kind of the Roger Penrose type world.”
102 / belief
“I think now is a good segue to talk about this paper in a little bit more detail.”
103 / belief
“If we learned it constructively, so we, you know, you speak about this in your paper, this complexification, the abstract building blocks, and you can do adaptive computation.”
104 / belief
“Very cool. And I think I didn't pick up on this. So you're doing a fixed number of steps.”
105 / belief
“You guys have possibly created what I think might be the best paper of of the year.”
106 / commitment
“You know, there's this path dependence idea. So we need to do supervision because we have the path dependence so we can guide the generation of the language models.”
107 / evaluation
“Yes, and on that point, I think maybe the most exciting thing about your paper is, you know, we were talking about path dependence and having this understanding which is built step by step, this process of complexification.”
108 / preference
“Because we we've got a we've got a great audience of ML engineers and scientists, and I think working for Socano would be the dream job.”
109 / disagreement
“I think I'm gonna disagree with that. I think the problem is we have plenty of very talented,”
110 / preference
“May I also submit that there could be an additional reason, which is, you know, I love that fractured and tangled representations paper.”
111 / preference
“Yeah. What I love about this functionalist perspective is the substrate independence.”
112 / recommendation
“Yes. I I love Douglas Hofstadter. So so there's this kind of self modeling and then second order self modeling and third order self modeling which could be applied to other agents and of course, know, in in the real world, we are computationally bounded.”
113 / belief
“You're pointing to this universal representation hypothesis. I think Chris Ola popularized it with some of his visualization experiments.”
114 / evaluation
“I think he would, because he he has a bunch of criteria, but 1 of them is is a fundamental coarse graining and reorganization of the micro substrate such that the new phenomena can be described with with a, you know, with within, you know, simple new variable.”
115 / recommendation
“I'm I'm huge fan of Andy's, big hero of mine. You probably didn't think that they would be so relevant later on in your career.”
116 / observation
“I am amenable by the way to this idea of loss of control, you know, which is that we we we start to build systems on top of systems on top of systems, and it's a little bit like the power station.”
117 / belief
“I think 25 was exactly the same and then I think the other 25% was nearly the same like 95% cosine distance on the embeddings or something like that.”
118 / prediction
“You know, if we had perfect verifiers and and synthetic data generators, probably we wouldn't even need LLMs in the first place, right, because we've already solved all the problems.”
119 / evaluation
“You know, when when something is, you know, trivially easy to mechanize, no 1 actually thought it was intelligent. But I think the Turing test is bad because we know that in my opinion, language models aren't actually that intelligent, yet we've passed it with flying colors.”
120 / belief
“We were talking about semantics earlier. So I I think you've done some work basically proving that semantic censorship for language is is impossible and you related it to the halting problem.”
121 / commitment
“We won't spend long on this because we've already filmed all about your model collapse paper in nature.”
122 / prediction
“Because I think at some point here soon, I don't know when, next year, 5 years, whatever, personalized, you know, AI models are gonna be a big thing.”
123 / recommendation
“Like, you know, they're As part of the Alpha Evolve system, which is very interesting, I recommend people watch that episode, you know, it goes and runs external verifiers.”
124 / belief
“I think the algorithm that runs in our brain is a is a Turing machine algorithm.”
125 / belief
“I I would say intelligence is the efficiency that you can acquire the tree, and reasoning is building the tree.”
126 / uncertainty
“I don't know if you've seen the recent couple of papers that are applying it to transformers, you know, where essentially it's it's kind of a step towards probabilistic models where you actually have this uncertainty quantification.”
127 / preference
“There's this phylogeny of of knowledge, and you need to respect it as much as possible because if you don't respect it, you're not grounded anymore. So it kind of feels to me that intuitively code is great because it means that I'm actually respecting the constraints and and the semantics are correct and it's grounded in in the real world.”
128 / commitment
“It was using Sonnet 3.5, and you had about 4 iterations, I think. And and, essentially, you you know, you were working on the ARC challenge, you were producing these programs through evolution.”
129 / preference
“I think I think with SGD because the fascinating thing is that, you know, if you look at all of the FSA algorithms, a a tiny sliver of those algorithms are capable of controlling, you know, a Turing machine and expanding their memory and so on.”
130 / prediction
“It's it's Turing complete. And our brains, even though they are finite, they run a Turing complete algorithm, which means our brains know how to expand their memory.”
131 / preference
“So on the first 1 as well, you were generating Python programs explicitly. And because of all the things that we're just talking about, I'm a big fan of that because I feel intuitively, and I think you did, that there's something special about Python programs.”
132 / evaluation
“We need not detain us now, but I think in traditional machine learning, transduction means that the test example is a function of your prediction.”
133 / evaluation
“The reason for that, as we discuss in today's show, is that current AI does not understand the world in a grounded way. It doesn't have a deep abstract understanding of the world, which is why the only way that we can make AI work effectively is by grounding the generation and supervising the training of AI models with human data.”
134 / preference
“Absolutely. And I I remember I read in in the first version of your blog post that you were talking about, we need to do this kind of deduction where we synthesize hypotheses, and then we we test them, and we do this kind of generate test loop.”
135 / evaluation
“Because there is a bit of an elephant in the room and in the scene at the moment, I think so many people just just don't have such a crisp understanding.”
136 / evaluation
“He's talking about things at a level of abstraction which, you know, can refer to anything, but it's beyond most people's cognitive horizon. But there is something to be said for that when when you can respect the history deep down into the epistemic tree, the creative stepping stones you take, because they respect the history, they actually have more evolvability.”
137 / belief
“Just a just a straight line. And I think was the second 1 something like 10 parameters and 10,000 parameters was the third 1.”
138 / evaluation
“I've never been able to completely pin you down, professor Friston, because there have been so many interpretations of the free energy principle that that lean internalist and externalist and even, the the hybrid version, which Maxwell also wrote a paper about.”
139 / evaluation
“We'll just turn up the temperature and we'll just sample tokens from the tail. And and you you really get garbage there because you're kind of, you know, you're you're a little bit out of distribution now.”
140 / belief
“I think there was a distinction as well that certainly Legg and Hunter, they were very focused on on their simplification of of the model and Occam's razor.”
141 / belief
“I think that's fair. We have an agent, And the agent is doing prediction in the environment.”
142 / belief
“I think that might be because Charlet Yeah. He describes process, which is the intelligence.”
143 / evaluation
“There is just 1 potential objection, which is that you know what a lot of theories of consciousness do is is they kind of they they brush it to 1 side and they treat it as something which is epiphenomenal, which means that it's not like causally embedded in in the system.”
144 / prediction
“I guess, in a way, I can't challenge you because you're already saying they need to be biological and and like, you know, physical and real and so because I mean, my my obvious retort to that would be, well, a computer simulation of those things obviously wouldn't be conscious.”
145 / prediction
“Yeah. And and if I understand correctly, I I think that I've spent years since I read that 2007 paper, but but it it it was about an agent minimizing common complexity, which can, like, do well on a on a the the expected performance on a wide range of environments.”
146 / recommendation
“I do recommend that folks at home read that, especially for folks in the MLST audience, because we're a little bit eclectic in our taste.”
147 / belief
“Mean, first of all, it was really interesting that political and demographic biases would emerge as coherent utility functions. And I I do take umbrage with this word emergence because I think in the emergence literature, there is a little bit more nuance to how machine learning people use the words.”
148 / belief
“Another very interesting thing in your paper because when I think about AI risk in general, we we've thought about this a little bit on the show before, is in terms of, stability and destabilization and the relationship between offense and defense.”
149 / uncertainty
“I mean, 1 thing I was thinking about is so certainly in in enigma about them, we're looking at multistep creative reasoning. And I don't know whether, again, there was some kind of human based methodology for filtering and coming up with ideas, or maybe your frame was, I have some technical principled intuition about what the limitations of AI models are, so I'm gonna lean in in that direction.”
150 / uncertainty
“You can improve to some margin, and we don't know what that margin would be if we had, like, agentic superintelligence.”
151 / evaluation
“So as as you've said, we use analogies like, electricity. And I think that's quite a good 1, because as as AI becomes enmeshed in into society, imagine how hard it would be to shut down a power station.”
152 / evaluation
“But in Genie 2, there was an ST transformer, so a special temporal transformer, which was conceptually quite similar to like a VIT. And there was a latent action model, which means even from non interactive data, you could infer some low cardinality action space.”
153 / evaluation
“You know, there's this annoying phrase like this is the worst the model will ever be.”
154 / evaluation
“We are here at Google DeepMind in London, and you guys have just demoed to me something which I think I'm more impressed with this, I think, than anything I've seen probably ever before.”
155 / preference
“I love that Ken Stanley paper, you know, the poet paper doing something like that.”
156 / evaluation
“Perhaps in the future, we might have an outer loop, which makes the system more open ended. But right now, my opinion, Genie 3, like all AI, gives you exactly what you asked for in the prompts and isn't creative on its own.”
157 / evaluation
“Today is a world exclusive of what is, in my opinion, the most mind blowing technology I've ever seen and the most poggers I've ever been.”
158 / evaluation
“I've also noticed that this model is is even better than v o 3 at things like text. It's because you you would think that they would they would dumb down the model to make it interactive and to make it this sophisticated.”
159 / preference
“You know, I'm a huge fan of open endedness, for example. And certainly at the moment, when we prompt models, if we're quite generic in what we put in the prompt, then we tend to get quite simplistic answers.”
160 / evaluation
“You know, it it it feels to me that the missing link is having the correct level of abstraction and being able to do this iterative open ended search. They can't do that because they simply don't have the abstractions.”
161 / evaluation
“These are continuous functions because most of the time in a neural network, like, if you if you give it a test sample, which is outside of the training support, it you're in no man's land.”
162 / uncertainty
“Duggar. But some people say, I don't know, like polysemanticity or grokking or scale and, you know, that that it just it just appears like the neural network isn't grokking it.”
163 / belief
“I mean, there's there's a few points here because I guess like what I was, where I was going with this before is, you take y equals x squared, and the reason why we think of it as robust is for any value of y, it kind of does something it does something reasonable.”
164 / commitment
“We know that we have certain things we can compose, and we know that we can compose them in certain topologies, and we know that invariably if we follow that trajectory, we will land on interesting things, even though we don't necessarily know exactly what we will land on.”
165 / belief
“We could easily discover something that what that wipes YouTube away. So it's about this epistemic gap between what we really want and what we think we want.”
166 / evaluation
“It doesn't work autonomously. It's not creative because it's not built on the foundation of a representation that describes the world well.”
167 / evaluation
“Right? And we are different from that because, you know, the the very basis of how we think is correlated to how the world works.”
168 / prediction
“It's a divergent, unpredictable, open ended search into the unknown. It's possible that the most important discoveries that we will eventually make will be the ones we aren't even looking for now.”