High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← All source episodes

Machine Learning Street Talk / episode intelligence

The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis (Kenneth Stanley, Akarsh Kumar)

6 Jul 2025 34 published claims 4 attributable people

Speakers in the public record

Claim mix

belief 20evaluation 7uncertainty 4preference 2commitment 1

Evidence policy

Every row below preserves an exact excerpt. Identified speakers are linked; unresolved voices are labeled and excluded from people counts.

Claim ledger

The useful parts, with receipts.

34 published records

01 / evaluation

You know, it it it feels to me that the missing link is having the correct level of abstraction and being able to do this iterative open ended search. They can't do that because they simply don't have the abstractions.

“You know, it it it feels to me that the missing link is having the correct level of abstraction and being able to do this iterative open ended search. They can't do that because they simply don't have the abstractions.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

02 / evaluation

These are continuous functions because most of the time in a neural network, like, if you if you give it a test sample, which is outside of the training support, it you're in no man's land.

“These are continuous functions because most of the time in a neural network, like, if you if you give it a test sample, which is outside of the training support, it you're in no man's land.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

03 / uncertainty

Duggar. But some people say, I don't know, like polysemanticity or grokking or scale and, you know, that that it just it just appears like the neural network isn't grokking it.

“Duggar. But some people say, I don't know, like polysemanticity or grokking or scale and, you know, that that it just it just appears like the neural network isn't grokking it.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

04 / belief

I think 1 of the really interesting things about the observation in this paper is it pokes a hole, I think, in a very deep assumption that we have that if the results are good, then what's underneath the hood is also good.

“I think 1 of the really interesting things about the observation in this paper is it pokes a hole, I think, in a very deep assumption that we have that if the results are good, then what's underneath the hood is also good.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

05 / belief

I mean, there's there's a few points here because I guess like what I was, where I was going with this before is, you take y equals x squared, and the reason why we think of it as robust is for any value of y, it kind of does something it does something reasonable.

“I mean, there's there's a few points here because I guess like what I was, where I was going with this before is, you take y equals x squared, and the reason why we think of it as robust is for any value of y, it kind of does something it does something reasonable.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

06 / belief

Like like, I think, you know, it's interesting, like, in the field of AI that if you go back 10 years or so, like, most of the interactions of AIs with dynamic training environments would be in simulations.

“Like like, I think, you know, it's interesting, like, in the field of AI that if you go back 10 years or so, like, most of the interactions of AIs with dynamic training environments would be in simulations.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

09 / belief

I think Ken would agree with the statement that if we really were to understand it, then we should have, then there should be exist like an algorithm that we can scale up right now that can recreate all the glamour of evolution.

“I think Ken would agree with the statement that if we really were to understand it, then we should have, then there should be exist like an algorithm that we can scale up right now that can recreate all the glamour of evolution.”
Speaker
Akarsh Kumar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

11 / commitment

We know that we have certain things we can compose, and we know that we can compose them in certain topologies, and we know that invariably if we follow that trajectory, we will land on interesting things, even though we don't necessarily know exactly what we will land on.

“We know that we have certain things we can compose, and we know that we can compose them in certain topologies, and we know that invariably if we follow that trajectory, we will land on interesting things, even though we don't necessarily know exactly what we will land on.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

12 / belief

We could easily discover something that what that wipes YouTube away. So it's about this epistemic gap between what we really want and what we think we want.

“We could easily discover something that what that wipes YouTube away. So it's about this epistemic gap between what we really want and what we think we want.”
Speaker
Tim Scarfe
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

13 / belief

I mean it's it's brilliant, it's insightful, it's important, It's visually 1 of the most beautiful papers I've seen in a in a long time. And I think even people just looking at this, will get the insight that you're talking about right now, like with Einstein, you know, because I mean, sure, we're not Einstein, but I think anybody who introspects the way they think, the way they think about solving problems, the way they think about a skull, the way they think about an apple, you know, they're gonna find that the images in this paper completely reflect the way we think about the world, the way we model the world.

“I mean it's it's brilliant, it's insightful, it's important, It's visually 1 of the most beautiful papers I've seen in a in a long time. And I think even people just looking at this, will get the insight that you're talking about right now, like with Einstein, you know, because I mean, sure, we're not Einstein, but I think anybody who introspects the way they think, the way they think about solving problems, the way they think about a skull, the way they think about an apple, you know, they're gonna find that the images in this paper completely reflect the way we think about the world, the way we model the world.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

14 / belief

Like, you know, we we think about, you know, when you say, like, eventually, if you experience enough of the world, like you say, of course, you might expect that your representation start to mirror just the way that the world is.

“Like, you know, we we think about, you know, when you say, like, eventually, if you experience enough of the world, like you say, of course, you might expect that your representation start to mirror just the way that the world is.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

15 / belief

I mean, 1 of the really important points I wanna add to this, this may also apply to humans. So I don't want to seem like I'm saying that all humans have unbelievably beautiful, unfractured We also, I think, victims of going through things in a bad order sometimes.

“I mean, 1 of the really important points I wanna add to this, this may also apply to humans. So I don't want to seem like I'm saying that all humans have unbelievably beautiful, unfractured We also, I think, victims of going through things in a bad order sometimes.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

16 / belief

I mean, like, creating an open end algorithm which solves this issue, I think, Jeff Kloon on our paper, he calls it, like, the trillion dollar question or the trillion dollar algorithm because that's basically, like, how you, if you think that the UFR, like, the unified factor representations are akin to, like, a human, then that's basically, like, creating, like, a human representation.

“I mean, like, creating an open end algorithm which solves this issue, I think, Jeff Kloon on our paper, he calls it, like, the trillion dollar question or the trillion dollar algorithm because that's basically, like, how you, if you think that the UFR, like, the unified factor representations are akin to, like, a human, then that's basically, like, creating, like, a human representation.”
Speaker
Akarsh Kumar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

17 / belief

I think if you still found a way to do this kind of evolutionary building up from simpler, you know, mappings, what you would end up doing is there would be there would be kind of an a a simple higher order layer that say took the spiral and chopped it up into 4 quadrants, like nice nice quadrants.

“I think if you still found a way to do this kind of evolutionary building up from simpler, you know, mappings, what you would end up doing is there would be there would be kind of an a a simple higher order layer that say took the spiral and chopped it up into 4 quadrants, like nice nice quadrants.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

18 / belief

What we care about is the all the downstream stuff that we're gonna use it for later, which is much harder to quantify, much harder to formalize than just a training loss.

“What we care about is the all the downstream stuff that we're gonna use it for later, which is much harder to quantify, much harder to formalize than just a training loss.”
Speaker
Akarsh Kumar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

19 / belief

You could say, this is good enough, I'm happy. But I think in terms of what we can't do because of that, that we might someday in the future be able to do, The things we can't do are the things where the human mind isn't having the ideas.

“You could say, this is good enough, I'm happy. But I think in terms of what we can't do because of that, that we might someday in the future be able to do, The things we can't do are the things where the human mind isn't having the ideas.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

20 / belief

I think, you know, your communication of open ended search and and kind of these this take on it has has been sharpened, you know, significantly since like 4 years ago when we talked.

“I think, you know, your communication of open ended search and and kind of these this take on it has has been sharpened, you know, significantly since like 4 years ago when we talked.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

21 / belief

I suspect it has more implications than just that because when we go beyond efficiency to things like creativity, what you're seeing is that the dimensions that have been discovered in the skull for example, align with new skulls, imagining new things in the world.

“I suspect it has more implications than just that because when we go beyond efficiency to things like creativity, what you're seeing is that the dimensions that have been discovered in the skull for example, align with new skulls, imagining new things in the world.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

22 / belief

I think there's a a direct or deep connection with, you know, poet like the work, you know, your earlier paper, right, on this kind of increasingly complex curriculum and environment where you start off training in simple cases and make them more and more complex.

“I think there's a a direct or deep connection with, you know, poet like the work, you know, your earlier paper, right, on this kind of increasingly complex curriculum and environment where you start off training in simple cases and make them more and more complex.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

23 / belief

I think about 4 years ago that we interviewed Kenneth the first time and it was eye opening then and and it and, you know, it's it's opened a lot of great open ended exploration for me personally.

“I think about 4 years ago that we interviewed Kenneth the first time and it was eye opening then and and it and, you know, it's it's opened a lot of great open ended exploration for me personally.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

24 / belief

Like, what are you objecting to? But the but the point is that it can still be an impostor because it's like what we care about here is not just that it's going to get answers right, like get good test scores, like seem to be plausibly human when you talk about things that are in distribution.

“Like, what are you objecting to? But the but the point is that it can still be an impostor because it's like what we care about here is not just that it's going to get answers right, like get good test scores, like seem to be plausibly human when you talk about things that are in distribution.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

25 / preference

I like that Goldilocks analogy a lot for evolution because I think Joel and Risto had a paper where it's like you need, like, some sort of catastrophic events to happen in order to get adaptable solutions.

“I like that Goldilocks analogy a lot for evolution because I think Joel and Risto had a paper where it's like you need, like, some sort of catastrophic events to happen in order to get adaptable solutions.”
Speaker
Akarsh Kumar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

26 / evaluation

We also show new examples. But you you know, the word reason I use the word indirect is because unlike these pick breeder images, we can't just go in and look at a neuron and know what it does explicitly because that's what's so nice about pick breeder images because they're 2 d.

“We also show new examples. But you you know, the word reason I use the word indirect is because unlike these pick breeder images, we can't just go in and look at a neuron and know what it does explicitly because that's what's so nice about pick breeder images because they're 2 d.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

29 / uncertainty

It could be though something implicit and indirect. And so I think I think overall, it's it's like Akash said, there's still some unknowns here about what actually what actually matters, what doesn't matter, especially with respect to the representation.

“It could be though something implicit and indirect. And so I think I think overall, it's it's like Akash said, there's still some unknowns here about what actually what actually matters, what doesn't matter, especially with respect to the representation.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

31 / preference

And he was like, I don't know. And I don't I don't wanna give you a recommendation because the point is that none of us are we're supposed to all follow what we think is the coolest thing and not just like just decide like, oh, when you put a 100% of our resources into this 1 thing.

“And he was like, I don't know. And I don't I don't wanna give you a recommendation because the point is that none of us are we're supposed to all follow what we think is the coolest thing and not just like just decide like, oh, when you put a 100% of our resources into this 1 thing.”
Speaker
Akarsh Kumar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

32 / evaluation

Like not butterflies, dragonflies. And and therein is the crux of the problem because we did this open ended cool thing and I mean part of the, let's say, downside of an open ended search is you don't know where you're gonna end up.

“Like not butterflies, dragonflies. And and therein is the crux of the problem because we did this open ended cool thing and I mean part of the, let's say, downside of an open ended search is you don't know where you're gonna end up.”
Speaker
Keith Duggar
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk

33 / evaluation

It's just emergent from how SGD climbs these gradients. But the thing that I think makes this really intriguing, the reason that the paper is because beyond just that, is that it gives you something that otherwise could never exist, which is a counterexample, that there actually do exist networks that don't have that issue.

“It's just emergent from how SGD climbs these gradients. But the thing that I think makes this really intriguing, the reason that the paper is because beyond just that, is that it gives you something that otherwise could never exist, which is a counterexample, that there actually do exist networks that don't have that issue.”
Speaker
Kenneth Stanley
Publisher
Machine Learning Street Talk
Search evidence