tool / uses
MATLAB
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
Public evidence record
Host · Machine Learning Street Talk
Books, apps, and tools
tool / uses
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
tool / uses
“during my PhD, I used Mathematica and MATLAB”
person / likes
“Yes. I I love Douglas Hofstadter. So so there's this kind of self modeling and then second order self modeling and third order self modeling which could be applied to other agents and of course, know, in in the real world, we are computationally bounded.”
person / likes
“I'm I'm huge fan of Andy's, big hero of mine. You probably didn't think that they would be so relevant later on in your career.”
Claim ledger
56 transcript-backed records
01 / evaluation
“The right word is jailbreaking and abuse because he fears regulatory overreaction from banning Chinese built open weights model.”
02 / evaluation
“A a lot of people are. And the these agents have an incredible amount of intelligence and flexibility, which means we don't precisely specify what they do.”
03 / evaluation
“Whereas in the in this sense, we're we're now abstracting them because there's also this orthogonality thesis as well, which is this intelligence of final goals are are, you know, disconnected from each other.”
04 / evaluation
“Maybe we can RL train it to refactor it, and we just have to kind of and it's very dangerous keeping going because now we're messing all of our code bases up and we're we're creating all of this slop everywhere.”
05 / evaluation
“similar context around them. And this is very pertinent because you've got a paper out basically saying that we should predict in the latent space, not the token space.”
06 / evaluation
“I guess the interesting thing for me is that when we think of reinforcement learning algorithms like AlphaGo Zero, it makes sense that they are reward seeking because there is this structured inference process.”
07 / evaluation
“Right? And it's a serious problem, because it's all about epistemic subjectivity, which is that you generate things that you don't understand, and it convinces you that it's correct, and you can't see the glitches.”
08 / evaluation
“Even that, I think you can argue, maybe not entirely the story, but it's definitely not the story for proteins because that's the hardest problem is the large scale structure.”
09 / evaluation
“Physicists, for example, they they work very, low level and they talk about, you know, the the the dynamics of particle systems and and whatnot. And what I'm really fascinated in, I mean, you come at it from an economics perspective, which is traditionally dominated by this agential lens, and you talk about equilibria and incentives and and so on.”
10 / evaluation
“Well, suppose another thing that doesn't help is that these these systems are like soup, and there's even a field called mechanistic interpretability that tries to kind of dig into the soup and and it's almost like they're they're searching for UFOs.”
11 / evaluation
“You know, and you make this series of decisions, and then you've got people using your application, and then you can't really wind that back. It doesn't matter if you've got the magical automation machine because you can't easily roll that back because there's lots of complexities, you know, do you see ICD testing?”
12 / evaluation
“Because I'm not I'm personally not worried about I I don't think the models today are intelligent at all.”
13 / evaluation
“Because the whole reason we created agile software development as a methodology is because it's inconceivable, It's outside our cognitive horizon.”
14 / evaluation
“These are problems that have been solved before in in part or in whole, which means when you look at the epistemic tree, many of the building blocks for solving them are very high up in the tree.”
15 / evaluation
“Right? So we're using neural networks because they're incredibly flexible and they understand a lot of things about the world, but they don't have the kind of constraints that we want.”
16 / evaluation
“I know a domain really well and I can specify it with exquisite detail and I tell Claude code, go and do this thing and the models in my mind doesn't matter.”
17 / evaluation
“The ARC was actually really amazing because it's the only intelligence benchmark that has survived for 5 years before being defeated.”
18 / evaluation
“I think the counterfactual thing is an important feature here because we could take something which was conscious or something which had agency, and we could just take a trace of the actual path which was found.”
19 / evaluation
“I agree that it's not because clearly we live in the physical world but there's an apparent disconnection.”
20 / evaluation
“We agents because you have consistent beliefs and ideas and you're not just an impulse response machine that's your being actions aren't determined entirely by this situation, you're a person.”
21 / evaluation
“I think if I remember correctly, at 1 point you drew an imaginary kind of graph where you said on 1 axis we have science realism, which is where our scientific theories actually represent things in the world, then we have empiricism, is the idea that facts we receive tell us something about the world.”
22 / evaluation
“Because as scientists, we want to build legible theories about how the world works.”
23 / evaluation
“Of course Pavlov and the dogs, folks at home will know about that. And Newton is still around, we still use that, but we don't use reflex theory anymore.”
24 / evaluation
“The problem is these 2 goals actually pull against each other.”
25 / evaluation
“I interviewed her recently. And she said that 1 of the most pervasive myths in neuroscience is that we use these leaky abstractions and idealizations to talk about cognition.”
26 / evaluation
“Simplicity tells you that you're on the right track. And in the blue corner, ignorantio, he thinks we simplify because we're too dumb to do otherwise.”
27 / evaluation
“No one's using the XLSTM. Not many people are using Mamba because why not? All you need to do is just scale the transformer as much as possible.”
28 / evaluation
“Yeah. It's really interesting what you said because the way I read that is things like chat GBT and language models, they are entropy smuggling or agency smuggling.”
29 / evaluation
“I I think part of it is it's a kind of acquiescence. So I think you're sequestering your agency when you externalize too much of your cognition, particularly if it's parts of your cognition that are useful in the sense that it has core knowledge which would generalize and help you acquire new knowledge or, it's just the the the proto ability of, you know, discovering knowledge.”
30 / evaluation
“So for example, someone might come up to me and say, blue swirly thing is over there. And I'll say, well, I don't know what you mean about the blue swirly thing because I've I've never seen 1 before.”
31 / evaluation
“I mean, because the way I read it in active inference literature, it's a very principled definition of an agent. And there's still a bit of a gap because I think Friston would argue, in the natural world, because of the the laws of physics and particles and and whatnot you get the emergence of things and things become agents when they have a certain you know depth of planning shall we say.”
32 / evaluation
“We we know from experience, right, that when we have experience, we get better at things. And we have this this weird, I don't know whether it's an illusion that all we need to do is just write down our understanding into into a wiki document.”
33 / evaluation
“You you can't seriously tell me that if you simulate fire using a computer program that that the computer would get hot or that you would get hot. It it just doesn't work like that.”
34 / evaluation
“Knowledge decays very, very quickly. And that's actually a good thing because it's the way that we can adapt our strategies because things that don't work die off.”
35 / evaluation
“And we'll move to the next level of our evolution. And in a sense, I think, even though I don't agree with it, because I think even with Neuralink, there's bandwidth problems.”
36 / evaluation
“Yes, and on that point, I think maybe the most exciting thing about your paper is, you know, we were talking about path dependence and having this understanding which is built step by step, this process of complexification.”
37 / evaluation
“I think he would, because he he has a bunch of criteria, but 1 of them is is a fundamental coarse graining and reorganization of the micro substrate such that the new phenomena can be described with with a, you know, with within, you know, simple new variable.”
38 / evaluation
“You know, when when something is, you know, trivially easy to mechanize, no 1 actually thought it was intelligent. But I think the Turing test is bad because we know that in my opinion, language models aren't actually that intelligent, yet we've passed it with flying colors.”
39 / evaluation
“We need not detain us now, but I think in traditional machine learning, transduction means that the test example is a function of your prediction.”
40 / evaluation
“The reason for that, as we discuss in today's show, is that current AI does not understand the world in a grounded way. It doesn't have a deep abstract understanding of the world, which is why the only way that we can make AI work effectively is by grounding the generation and supervising the training of AI models with human data.”
41 / evaluation
“Because there is a bit of an elephant in the room and in the scene at the moment, I think so many people just just don't have such a crisp understanding.”
42 / evaluation
“He's talking about things at a level of abstraction which, you know, can refer to anything, but it's beyond most people's cognitive horizon. But there is something to be said for that when when you can respect the history deep down into the epistemic tree, the creative stepping stones you take, because they respect the history, they actually have more evolvability.”
43 / evaluation
“I've never been able to completely pin you down, professor Friston, because there have been so many interpretations of the free energy principle that that lean internalist and externalist and even, the the hybrid version, which Maxwell also wrote a paper about.”
44 / evaluation
“We'll just turn up the temperature and we'll just sample tokens from the tail. And and you you really get garbage there because you're kind of, you know, you're you're a little bit out of distribution now.”
45 / evaluation
“There is just 1 potential objection, which is that you know what a lot of theories of consciousness do is is they kind of they they brush it to 1 side and they treat it as something which is epiphenomenal, which means that it's not like causally embedded in in the system.”
46 / evaluation
“So as as you've said, we use analogies like, electricity. And I think that's quite a good 1, because as as AI becomes enmeshed in into society, imagine how hard it would be to shut down a power station.”
47 / evaluation
“But in Genie 2, there was an ST transformer, so a special temporal transformer, which was conceptually quite similar to like a VIT. And there was a latent action model, which means even from non interactive data, you could infer some low cardinality action space.”
48 / evaluation
“You know, there's this annoying phrase like this is the worst the model will ever be.”
49 / evaluation
“We are here at Google DeepMind in London, and you guys have just demoed to me something which I think I'm more impressed with this, I think, than anything I've seen probably ever before.”
50 / evaluation
“Perhaps in the future, we might have an outer loop, which makes the system more open ended. But right now, my opinion, Genie 3, like all AI, gives you exactly what you asked for in the prompts and isn't creative on its own.”
51 / evaluation
“Today is a world exclusive of what is, in my opinion, the most mind blowing technology I've ever seen and the most poggers I've ever been.”
52 / evaluation
“I've also noticed that this model is is even better than v o 3 at things like text. It's because you you would think that they would they would dumb down the model to make it interactive and to make it this sophisticated.”
53 / evaluation
“You know, it it it feels to me that the missing link is having the correct level of abstraction and being able to do this iterative open ended search. They can't do that because they simply don't have the abstractions.”
54 / evaluation
“These are continuous functions because most of the time in a neural network, like, if you if you give it a test sample, which is outside of the training support, it you're in no man's land.”
55 / evaluation
“It doesn't work autonomously. It's not creative because it's not built on the foundation of a representation that describes the world well.”
56 / evaluation
“Right? And we are different from that because, you know, the the very basis of how we think is correlated to how the world works.”