Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedJason Cohen: belief
25 Jan 2026 Lenny's Podcast 5 questions to ask when your product stops growing | Jason Cohen (2x unicorn founder)
“None of this proves you should change your market, but when you say there's nothing we can do about it, you are closing the door on these things that might be the right thing. And very often, as I think probably a lot of people here on this listening to this know, the market segment you pick has a lot to do with your retention rate because everyone acts differently.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Jason Cohen
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 25 Jan 2026
- Publisher
- Lenny's Podcast
Transcript context
…The roots cause. Yeah, the more root. I think some people probably say five whys and just paper over what I just said with that. And maybe so, but let's not be so simplistic about that, because again, five why sometimes implies that there's some root cause at the bottom of the whys. Let's be a little more smart about that. So anyway, these things too expensive, this is not it. Maybe project ended really is project ended. Okay. But even there, I see just today, today on an entrepreneur forum I'm on, someone said, "Yeah, we're starting to see more people have project ended as the reason, and so there's nothing we can do about that." Now see, that's incorrect. That's only true if you only look at the proximate thing, which is project ended. You're correct that you can't make that project not end exactly. Yeah. Okay, but wait a minute. If your software was more successful and the project was more successful, would it have ended or is that actually an indicator that your product wasn't that useful or didn't do its job? It's possible, like in this case, who knows, right? But that's possible that it really is your fault. Another example is, but you picked what target segments you are going after. Did you pick a market segment that was easier to sell to, but their projects end like small business and consumers where very often the small business does go out of business where the project ends, et cetera? Because when things are small, they have high variance and lots of things can knock them off the path and so on. And so is it your fault for picking the wrong ideal customer profile or target segment? And so yes, that one case of that one project, that's not your fault, quote-unquote, but by saying that you're just ignoring the fact that there is maybe something to do about it... Now, all this is maybe. None of this proves you should change your market, but when you say there's nothing we can do about it, you are closing the door on these things that might be the right thing. And very often, as I think probably a lot of people here on this listening to this know, the market segment you pick has a lot to do with your retention rate because everyone acts differently. And so anyway, so I know it's a lot on this topic, but I just feel constantly, people make this particular mistake of just abdicating responsibility or just listening to the first thing they hear and saying that's the reason and that's not right. So that's the big thing about listening. Another thing is you got to ask when people are in trouble, but not yet canceled. You might be able to save them. You certainly can learn more because you can talk to them. They're not shut off yet from you. So this might be, they never uploaded their data, so they're not being successful. They are calling tech support too much. They're in trouble. They're not calling tech support enough. They're not engaged. They didn't log in for a while. d their data, so they're not being successful. They are calling tech support too much. They're in trouble. They're not calling tech support enough. They're not engaged. They didn't log in for a while. There's all kinds of things where... Now, of course, the details are going to depend on the product, obviously, but there are signals that are correlated with cancellation. Now, if you have a lot of data, you can literally correlate signals with cancellation and try to extract that precisely, but even without data, you can guess. And guessing and having a theory, acting accordingly, and as you get more data adjusting your theory, this is a wise way to proceed even without data. So if you can catch them when they seem like they're off the happy path, they're in trouble, that's a better time to do it. And then the last thing I would say about this detection is if you don't know what to do or all else being equal, then focus- ... because if you don't know what to do, or all else being equal, then focus on onboarding. Almost all companies have a whole lot more cancellation in the first day, 30 days, 90 days, depends, but the first period than the whole rest of the customer's life. And also, small changes in the onboarding can have large effects on cancellation, whereas later on, that's not necessarily true. It could be, but it's not necessarily true. So a really dramatic version of this is if you've ever done YouTube videos, which I know you have, but if a listener has ever done a YouTube video and you see the "retention", quote unquote, of the viewer on a YouTube video, it has this thing where it falls just so much, you can't believe, in the first 30 seconds, and then, if it's a decent video, it'll flatten out as people decide to watch the video. So in that crazy-looking curve, for the people that have watched it for 15 minutes, maybe there's something you could do to keep a few of them staying to the end, but that's not going to change very much how many people get to the end. Whereas for me, I've only done a few, but what I see is about 50% fall off in the first 30 seconds. Well, if I can get that from 50% to 55% stay, that's an additional... And at the end of the line, I only have 20% still there, which is pretty good for a longer video. But if I get it from 50 to 55, I might go from 20 to 25% staying. In other words, if I shifted 10% at the front, which maybe I could do, I can't be dramatic but maybe a little, then in the output, I might be able to increase it by 20, 30%. So that's a huge change, and so the SaaS equivalent is, as we all know, if they leave early, not only is it bad but it's super unprofitable, because you spend all this money to acquire them and then they never stayed around long enough to pay it back, much less to be profitable. So if you can do a little bit in the onboarding or shift the onboarding percentage a little bit, it pays off enormously in revenue and profit over time by making them successful. So again, if you don't know what to do, onboarding is a good bet, and even if you do know what to do, I'll still bet that onboarding is a good bet for where to go.…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.