High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← All source episodes

The Cognitive Revolution / episode intelligence

Building & Scaling the AI Safety Research Community, with Ryan Kidd of MATS

4 Jan 2026 31 published claims 2 attributable people

Speakers in the public record

Claim mix

belief 13prediction 5uncertainty 5evaluation 3recommendation 2preference 2commitment 1

Evidence policy

Every row below preserves an exact excerpt. Identified speakers are linked; unresolved voices are labeled and excluded from people counts.

Claim ledger

The useful parts, with receipts.

31 published records

01 / prediction

That's a lot, right? So we should definitely be considering scenarios that are sooner, right, and particularly, I think the sooner AGI happens, the more dangerous it might be, right?

“That's a lot, right? So we should definitely be considering scenarios that are sooner, right, and particularly, I think the sooner AGI happens, the more dangerous it might be, right?”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

05 / uncertainty

I mean, you mentioned Les Wrong and Eliezer, and there's this sort of, I don't know all the lore of Matt's, but I do understand that a lot of people who have participated in it over time come out of the Eliezer discourse and had a certain set of assumptions that were like, we're not going to be able to teach this thing our values, it's going to be extremely unwieldy from the beginning.

“I mean, you mentioned Les Wrong and Eliezer, and there's this sort of, I don't know all the lore of Matt's, but I do understand that a lot of people who have participated in it over time come out of the Eliezer discourse and had a certain set of assumptions that were like, we're not going to be able to teach this thing our values, it's going to be extremely unwieldy from the beginning.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

06 / belief

I kind of I think of them more as like Obviously they're quite different too across the different companies, but I think of it less as like trying to get rich and more like trying to make a real mark on history is kind of the biggest summary that I would give for a lot of them.

“I kind of I think of them more as like Obviously they're quite different too across the different companies, but I think of it less as like trying to get rich and more like trying to make a real mark on history is kind of the biggest summary that I would give for a lot of them.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

08 / uncertainty

I both watched a talk of yours and read a blog post from about 18 months ago where you kind of sketch out the different archetypes of AI researcher that you have seen, and then also kind of map that onto the demands of organizations. And I don't know how much it's changed.

“I both watched a talk of yours and read a blog post from about 18 months ago where you kind of sketch out the different archetypes of AI researcher that you have seen, and then also kind of map that onto the demands of organizations. And I don't know how much it's changed.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

09 / belief

I think that the way we do it is pretty good and that we have a bunch of, for our model API calls and all that, we have specific organization accounts that we sign people up, and then we kind of give them a budget and so on and top them up as necessary.

“I think that the way we do it is pretty good and that we have a bunch of, for our model API calls and all that, we have specific organization accounts that we sign people up, and then we kind of give them a budget and so on and top them up as necessary.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

10 / belief

One thing that jumps out is like maybe not as emphasized as I would have thought is being in command of current research. That's something I think at this point, like really nobody can keep up with all the current research because, you know, that exponential has gotten away from all feeble human minds, I would say, maybe with a few hyperlexics that can still keep up.

“One thing that jumps out is like maybe not as emphasized as I would have thought is being in command of current research. That's something I think at this point, like really nobody can keep up with all the current research because, you know, that exponential has gotten away from all feeble human minds, I would say, maybe with a few hyperlexics that can still keep up.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

11 / belief

Now you could say like, okay, what if you also tried to pour resources into like secret AI safety projects at the same time, delay RLHF, delay ChatGPT, build up the AI safety field, uh uh via networks the myri summer schools weren't doing a lot and MATS came along uh just before the ChatGPT moment December 2021 and yeah I think like the first MATS cohorts were a little bit less like a little bit more directionless than the later cohorts definitely like I think safety research really kicked into gear after we had ChatGPT uh not to say that was the only cause but there were like a lot of things happening around that time and I think that like Definitely larger, more capable models have enabled certain types of essential safety research you could not do with smaller models.

“Now you could say like, okay, what if you also tried to pour resources into like secret AI safety projects at the same time, delay RLHF, delay ChatGPT, build up the AI safety field, uh uh via networks the myri summer schools weren't doing a lot and MATS came along uh just before the ChatGPT moment December 2021 and yeah I think like the first MATS cohorts were a little bit less like a little bit more directionless than the later cohorts definitely like I think safety research really kicked into gear after we had ChatGPT uh not to say that was the only cause but there were like a lot of things happening around that time and I think that like Definitely larger, more capable models have enabled certain types of essential safety research you could not do with smaller models.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

13 / belief

I thought we would maybe just start with kind of big picture from your perspective. And I think, you know, having watched some of your previous talks, I know that you play sort of a portfolio strategy where you're not like, I have a very specific, narrow prediction, and I'm trying to maximize the value of this organization, this program for that very hyper-specific prediction.

“I thought we would maybe just start with kind of big picture from your perspective. And I think, you know, having watched some of your previous talks, I know that you play sort of a portfolio strategy where you're not like, I have a very specific, narrow prediction, and I'm trying to maximize the value of this organization, this program for that very hyper-specific prediction.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

14 / uncertainty

What does the kind of funnel look like in terms of, I don't know if there's intermediate steps that, you know, would make sense to talk about selected. And then I think the good news, though, is if you do get into the program, your success rate on the other end of like getting into the field in a professional W-2 employee status sort of way is really high.

“What does the kind of funnel look like in terms of, I don't know if there's intermediate steps that, you know, would make sense to talk about selected. And then I think the good news, though, is if you do get into the program, your success rate on the other end of like getting into the field in a professional W-2 employee status sort of way is really high.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

18 / belief

With some additional caveat that like we also have some diversity picks. and minimum requirements because we want to support a great breadth of research and we think that the mentor selection committee on the whole might be biased in some ways as well.

“With some additional caveat that like we also have some diversity picks. and minimum requirements because we want to support a great breadth of research and we think that the mentor selection committee on the whole might be biased in some ways as well.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

19 / uncertainty

The time period required would require massive amounts of cognitive labor and human trials and stuff like that. And I don't know, it does sound very sci-fi, so I don't think we should rely on something like that, though I'm all for people pursuing moonshots on the side.

“The time period required would require massive amounts of cognitive labor and human trials and stuff like that. And I don't know, it does sound very sci-fi, so I don't think we should rely on something like that, though I'm all for people pursuing moonshots on the side.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

20 / belief

I think even in some of the interp streams as well, it's very possible to enter an interpretability stream and bring it with it like some model of the kind of theory-based interpretability mechanism or strategy that you want to pursue and then see that executed on.

“I think even in some of the interp streams as well, it's very possible to enter an interpretability stream and bring it with it like some model of the kind of theory-based interpretability mechanism or strategy that you want to pursue and then see that executed on.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

21 / belief

Uh, though it does seem like there's some debate about this and it seems like some of, some of the deception, it's far from what we might call consequentialist, like, like ******** consequentialist deception in most situations, but I think like Alignment faking and some other papers have shown that there are such, you can like create situations where AI will deceive the user to achieve some like ulterior objective, which was something that was like deliberately given to the AI as an objective.

“Uh, though it does seem like there's some debate about this and it seems like some of, some of the deception, it's far from what we might call consequentialist, like, like ******** consequentialist deception in most situations, but I think like Alignment faking and some other papers have shown that there are such, you can like create situations where AI will deceive the user to achieve some like ulterior objective, which was something that was like deliberately given to the AI as an objective.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

22 / recommendation

on the margin because I think we do have some very strong central research bets that we need more people pursuing because they will yield demonstrable results.

“on the margin because I think we do have some very strong central research bets that we need more people pursuing because they will yield demonstrable results.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

23 / evaluation

Yeah, so that brings up another, I think, huge question for AI safety research in general, and probably the strongest, maybe not in, I don't know if you would say strongest in the sense of being most compelling to you, but certainly the most hawkish or fiercest criticism that AI safety research gets is that it always ends up being dual use and that it always ends up somehow accelerating the core capabilities track.

“Yeah, so that brings up another, I think, huge question for AI safety research in general, and probably the strongest, maybe not in, I don't know if you would say strongest in the sense of being most compelling to you, but certainly the most hawkish or fiercest criticism that AI safety research gets is that it always ends up being dual use and that it always ends up somehow accelerating the core capabilities track.”
Speaker
Nathan Labenz
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

25 / prediction

Which, by the way, is predicated on this idea that verification is easier than generation, P versus NP, blah, blah, blah, especially if you can see the other person's thoughts and they can't see yours. It does make sense to be at the frontier from that perspective, but I will say that I think the main reason that the companies are doing this is obviously to make money.

“Which, by the way, is predicated on this idea that verification is easier than generation, P versus NP, blah, blah, blah, especially if you can see the other person's thoughts and they can't see yours. It does make sense to be at the frontier from that perspective, but I will say that I think the main reason that the companies are doing this is obviously to make money.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

26 / prediction

I will say this, that like amplifiers, while not currently the most in demand across all different hierarchies of AI safety organization or team are, I think, probably in the next year or two going to be the most in demand.

“I will say this, that like amplifiers, while not currently the most in demand across all different hierarchies of AI safety organization or team are, I think, probably in the next year or two going to be the most in demand.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

28 / prediction

Epoch recently did a study where they showed the pace of new AI companies approaching the frontier is just so much faster than the pace of which the frontier moves because there's an abundance of chips, there's an abundance of data and methods.

“Epoch recently did a study where they showed the pace of new AI companies approaching the frontier is just so much faster than the pace of which the frontier moves because there's an abundance of chips, there's an abundance of data and methods.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

29 / prediction

I think building a second species is actually going to violate some deep social more in the same way that human cloning would be, but I don't think people will see it that way. So that leaves us with the fact that we actually have to build the AGI because But if we can build products that are safer, right, or perhaps are under some strict regulatory control that we have some like really like ideally like, I don't know, 10 year international slow phased entry to the new AGI world, right, where all these, you know, countries and companies are kind of forced to be very careful and collaborative in the way that they align their models, then we're in a much better world.

“I think building a second species is actually going to violate some deep social more in the same way that human cloning would be, but I don't think people will see it that way. So that leaves us with the fact that we actually have to build the AGI because But if we can build products that are safer, right, or perhaps are under some strict regulatory control that we have some like really like ideally like, I don't know, 10 year international slow phased entry to the new AGI world, right, where all these, you know, countries and companies are kind of forced to be very careful and collaborative in the way that they align their models, then we're in a much better world.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution

30 / preference

I guess I could shout out, I mean, it's hard to play favorites because Matt's is like, we've worked with so many people and we're trying to be very broad, but Yeah, I guess like in terms of nonprofits specifically, because maybe they don't get as much attention, obviously Redwood and Meter and Randcast, Apollo Research, FAR, Goodfire, TruthfullyAI, LawZero, Miri, plenty of others.

“I guess I could shout out, I mean, it's hard to play favorites because Matt's is like, we've worked with so many people and we're trying to be very broad, but Yeah, I guess like in terms of nonprofits specifically, because maybe they don't get as much attention, obviously Redwood and Meter and Randcast, Apollo Research, FAR, Goodfire, TruthfullyAI, LawZero, Miri, plenty of others.”
Speaker
Ryan Kidd
Publisher
The Cognitive Revolution
Search evidence