Marc Andreessen: belief

Transcript context

…I think that's great. I think that's really relevant. And then Scott Adamson, firstly, just passed away, which is a real tragedy. But I referred for years to, actually, Scott Adams. He had this famous career advice he would give people, which I think makes a lot of sense. Which dovetails with what you're saying, which- ... advice he would give people which I think makes a lot of sense, which dovetails with what you're saying, which is he used to say it's like, look, he said, "I could have been a pretty good cartoonist or I could have been pretty good at business, but the fact that I was a cartoonist who understood business made me spectacularly great at making Dilbert." Because even the world's best cartoonist who didn't understand business could have never written Dilbert, and then the world's best business people who didn't know how to do cartoons couldn't have done Dilbert. It took somebody who actually had both of those skills to be able to make Dilbert which is one of the most successful cartoons in history. And so the way Scott always described it was that from a career development standpoint, the additive effect of being good at two things is more than double. The additive effect of being good at three things is more than triple because you become a super relevant specialist in the combination of the domains, and, look, I mean, you see this all over the economy. I mean, you see this all over the economy, but I'll give you an example. Hollywood, just Hollywood as an example. There are a lot of writers who can't direct a movie and they can be very successful writers. There are a lot of directors who can't write a movie. They can be very successful directors. But the superstars in the entertainment industry are the people who can write and direct. They don't have a term for those. They call us auteurors, and those are the people who are the real creative forces that move the field. And so again, and by the way, Hollywood, actually it's really funny, I've been spending a lot of time talking to Hollywood people about AI. Hollywood has the same Mexican stand-off going right now that we describe in tech, except in Hollywood, for example, for filmmaking, it's the director, it's the writer, and the actor. Because the director is now thinking, "Wow, I don't need the writer anymore because the AI can write the script and I don't need the actor anymore because I can have AI actors." The writer is saying, "Well, I don't need the director because I can direct the movie and the AI can do the actors." And the actor is saying, "I don't need either one of these guys. I can have the AI direct the thing, I can have the AI write the thing and I'm just going to show up and do my performance." And so it's the same kind of triangular configuration, and again, what's great about it is they're all correct. I can have the AI write the thing and I'm just going to show up and do my performance." And so it's the same kind of triangular configuration, and again, what's great about it is they're all correct. Each person in each of those three fields is going to be able to expand laterally and pick up those additional skills, and then as a consequence, you're going to have more people who can write and direct or write and act or direct and act or do all three. I think to your point, your T-shaped thing, I think that's going to be true basically across the entire economy. And if you think about the T, if you think about the T configuration, it's like, yeah, the breadth, the top of the T is like how many individual domains are you familiar enough with to be able to use the AI tools to be able to do really good work. And then this part of the T is how deep can you go in at least one of those domains so that you really, really deeply know what you're doing. But if you're super deep on coding and you can use AI to do design and you can use AI to do product management, that's your T right there, and you're a triple threat at the top of the T, but with this level of technical grounding underneath that. I mean, at that point, again, you're the super-powered individual, you're going to be able to just perform like sheets of magic, for example, in terms of designing and building your products that people in my generation couldn't have even dreamed of. And so I think that this is a universal kind of theory that I think can apply across the entire economy. I'm going to invent a new framework right now. Okay, forget the T framework. I'm picturing an F sideways or an E where there's three, two or three, I don't know, downward parts. And so what I'm hearing is get good at least two or three.…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.