Evidence receipt / preference
Published · transcript-backedBrett Harrison: preference
13 Mar 2023 Dwarkesh Podcast Brett Harrison — FTX US former president speaks out
“In that case, I would say yes, because I think that you get a lot of the sort of static typing and compile time safety in Rust that you get from Ocamol.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Brett Harrison
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- preference
- Recorded
- 13 Mar 2023
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
Transcript context
…Yeah. In that case, I would say yes, because I think that you get a lot of the sort of static typing and compile time safety in Rust that you get from Ocamol. But the base level program that you can write in Rust is much, much faster than one you can write in Okamel because of the way Ocamel is designed, where there's this kind of automatic garbage collection, the worst thing you can do in high speed finance is do any memory allocation that results in garbage collection. And so you have to write very, very careful o camel that almost ends up looking like C in order to end up staying in functional programming land, but not actually creating tons of memory on the heap or the stack that ends up getting collected later. I guess you've been playing around with the Rust a lot recently, right?…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.