High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / belief

Published · transcript-backed

Michael Kremer: belief

21 Oct 2020 Conversations with Tyler Michael Kremer on Economists as Founders

“I don’t think this is exclusively tied to development economics since the experimental method, but I could explain a little bit more about why I think the experimental method and contemporary development economics research does have a natural affinity for that.”

— Michael Kremer

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Michael Kremer
Attribution
Verified speaker
Claim type
belief
Recorded
21 Oct 2020
Publisher
Conversations with Tyler

Transcript context

…What comparative advantage of yours is it using? A lot of economists will produce ideas and let other people do all the founding. What is it that you bring to founding that’s special to you? There’s a lot of relationship between the experimental method and the things that are needed to help found organizations. I think that’s something that, historically in economics, many of us have seen research as something that’s divorced from doing things in the real world and, in some cases, even antithetical to it. I think that’s really different in many other fields. Nobody thinks it’s strange that people who are in computer science go on to found firms, or that people who are researchers in biology go on sometimes to found firms. Obviously, there are plenty of people in computer science or in biology who aren’t interested in that, but people don’t think it’s strange that there’s some people in those fields who do. We’re now getting to a time in economics where I don’t think I’m unique in this. Many economics researchers — researchers in development economics, in particular — have gone on to found organizations, and those have had real impact. I don’t think this is exclusively tied to development economics since the experimental method, but I could explain a little bit more about why I think the experimental method and contemporary development economics research does have a natural affinity for that. But that I get. Why do you have a natural affinity? If I think about your O-ring model — as you know, that predicts the less productive people in an organization, in a way, drag down the productivity of the more productive people. Now, you’re one of the most productive people. You might think, according to O-ring theory, maybe you should found with Abhijit and Esther, but not with anyone else. There’s not a certain comparative advantage in that model. How do you think about the economics of you as founder? How should I model that?…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence