High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / belief

Published · transcript-backed

Speaker unverified: belief

31 Mar 2026 Cheeky Pint Compliance at scale and why TAM is a distraction with Christina Cacioppo of Vanta

“I think to a naive SOC 2 audit, you're like, "Those seem like two user IDs had that conversation, and so we can go forward.”

— Speaker unverified

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Speaker unverified
Attribution
Not verified from this transcript
Claim type
belief
Recorded
31 Mar 2026
Publisher
Cheeky Pint

Transcript context

…How does this work with agentic coding where the honest answer to the number of human reviewers to this code is zero? Yes. How should it work? Because right now it is like, well, somebody needs to be like, "I did code..." I think right now it's like agent writes code, human or agent puts up PR, maybe human or agent reviews it. I think to a naive SOC 2 audit, you're like, "Those seem like two user IDs had that conversation, and so we can go forward. " But it's more about having two throats to choke as opposed to we read the code of this ATM software and guaranteed that you didn't introduce a money glitch.…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence