Speaker unverified: belief

Transcript context

…That's cool. Okay, so where do you think it goes broadly? I think that so much of the work of a compliance team is, again, keeping things in sync, keeping different sorts of text in sync. Adding on new compliance regimes, which is just adding controls. But really, do you want to map the new ones to the old ones and figure out what the duplicates are? That's actually a huge part, classically, of the work of a compliance team. I think there are so many opportunities for LLMs and agentic workflows in Vanta's business. We probably have a couple dozen of them. If I think about our roadmap, knock on all the things, we'll have hundreds by the end of the year. What we've been doing is breaking down what folks do. You're like, "Okay, there's the questionnaire piece." If you send out a questionnaire, someone has to read it on the other side. Then you have to think about it and figure out where does it work, where it doesn't? "Oh, I have this new policy update. I need to put this thing in a policy. We're going to start doing ISO 42001, which is the new AI standard. How do I map that in? I need to rerun a risk assessment. I'm going to change my risk score." Anyway, all of these things, all of these tasks are all just workflows that you could have an AI do, write an eval against with subject-matter experts, and then hill climb until they're quite good. It feels like you can't reason about the number of people in a profession, especially at a certain stage of company changing. If you think back to ancient times, I don't know, the year 2000, if you had a 10-person company with 10 Gateway 2000 beige workstations, they probably would have had an IT person. That IT person would have had—…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.