Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedBrad Carson: belief
31 May 2026 Machine Learning Street Talk When AI Decides You're a Threat — Brad Carson
“I think, you know, with this incredible power does come some responsibility that's not codified in law. It's really almost a moral obligation, which to their credit, I think many of the companies recognize this and do their best you know, to try to satisfy that that itch.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Brad Carson
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 31 May 2026
- Publisher
- Machine Learning Street Talk
Transcript context
…Anthropic made a bunch of changes to kind of Claude's behavior in terms of tokens and allocation and what models were running and things. And it really frustrated a lot of the people in our in our Discord server, in machinelearningstreet.discord. They felt like, hey, we were paying for something and then it just was radically changed, you know, overnight. And and yet there's there's no clarity around what were we paying for before and what are we paying for now. And it's almost just at the whims of of the service companies. Right? There's just no transparency to it. Yeah. I mean, you could think of that as consumer protection, that people should tell you what the service is going to be that you're paying for. And if they change it, right, this could be a breach of contract in some way. But I think now the AI companies, the frontier AI companies at least, you know, have a certain almost global stature. Everyone recognize that this is a project that is going to go have, you know, epochal consequence for us. And so you have you're not just like your average hardware store, you know, that could change things and no 1 cares. You have almost a public responsibility to get a lot of this right. And part of it is minimally to be trustworthy. You know? And that's what transparency is all about, to say, here's what we do. Here's, you know, from our perspective, the data you were trained on. Here's its capabilities. Here's what our internal policies are, and we're going to adhere to them. If we're going to change them, we'll notify you about it, give some justification for it. I think, you know, with this incredible power does come some responsibility that's not codified in law. It's really almost a moral obligation, which to their credit, I think many of the companies recognize this and do their best you know, to try to satisfy that that itch. But you can see that people scrutinize them and more will be asked of them still. Okay. Somebody uses a tool, in this case, it's AI, to do something bad. Right? You know, a deep a deep pornographic fake of, you know, some some poor victim or whatever. You know, do we blame the tools or do we blame blame the person misusing misusing those tools? It's like you post some deep fake porn image on on x or wherever, like, what happens to you? Like, I don't know. I haven't seen those people being held accountable.…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.