Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedDwarkesh Patel: belief
27 Oct 2022 Dwarkesh Podcast Brian Potter - Future of Construction, Ugly Modernism, & Environmental Review
“I think there are a lot of examples where if you don't have the context on why they were built a certain way, you wouldn't understand what was going on.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Dwarkesh Patel
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 27 Oct 2022
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
Transcript context
…e who stole this stole the plans for how to make it or who had information on exactly how their system would react if the bomb worked basically took as long to figure out how to make it as the US did. So with a physical object, just the process used to make it is not necessarily super legible and it tends to be a little bit hidden. I was gonna say that perhaps that is not as true for software, but I actually realized that I don't actually know and it's very plausible to me that you could have some piece of software that was written, and then it'd just be utterly inscrutable as to how it came together and how you could maybe duplicate a similar piece of software. Is that like a category error? Yeah, that's a really good question. I think there are a lot of examples where if you don't have the context on why they were built a certain way, you wouldn't understand what was going on. If you've heard of the fast inverse square root, that's exactly what I was thinking of. Yeah, yeah.…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.