Speaker unverified: commitment

Transcript context

…That's what I live for. Amazing. Just to push back on the first-party thing, I accept that the large model labs have just done a lot of work for you that you didn't need to duplicate. But you now are sitting on so much proprietary data that it may be worth training on the trajectories that you're collecting. So maybe it's a pendulum back to first-party. Yeah, I mean, I think like, I mean, we've been pretty clear from like a security posture perspective. I think there's like both like, you know, customer trust and like, I mean, I kind of want, like, let me opt in. I think that there is signals that we do get from our users that we can utilize. Like, there's a lot of preference information that we get, for example. Which is effectively what you're saying of like, our trajectories, our trajectories good. We, like, I will say this, the super complete product that we have has gone materially better because of us not only using synthetic data, but also getting the preference data from our users of like, hey, given these set of trajectories, here's actually what a good outcome is. And in fact, one of the really beautiful parts about our product that is very different than a chat GPT is that the acceptance happened and it happened even more than that. Right? Like, let's say you accepted it, but then after accepting it, you deleted three or four items in there. We can see that. So that actually lets us get to even better than acceptance as a metric. Because we're in the ultimate work output of the developer. It's the preference between the acceptance and what actually happened. If you can actually get ground truth of what actually happened, this is the beauty of being in the ID, then like, yeah, you get a lot of information there. Did you have this with the extension or is this pure Windsurf?…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.