High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / belief

Published · transcript-backed

Philip E. Tetlock: belief

22 Apr 2020 Conversations with Tyler Philip E. Tetlock on Forecasting and Foraging as a Fox

“I think you’d want an interdisciplinary team. Diversity is one of these words that’s been reduced to a cliché, but we have found in our work that cognitive diversity helps, and it helps in certain quite well-defined ways.”

— Philip E. Tetlock

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Philip E. Tetlock
Attribution
Verified speaker
Claim type
belief
Recorded
22 Apr 2020
Publisher
Conversations with Tyler

Transcript context

…If we’re trying to estimate how much people cut back on their risk-taking behavior because they’re afraid of the virus, are the group of people best suited to do that epidemiologists, other social scientists, or your superforecasters? Maybe even economists, right? We study elasticities. Why should it be the epidemiologists? I think you’d want an interdisciplinary team. Diversity is one of these words that’s been reduced to a cliché, but we have found in our work that cognitive diversity helps, and it helps in certain quite well-defined ways. If you want to create a composite that out-predicts the vast majority of the superforecasters, a good way to do it is not only to take the most recent forecast of the best forecasters in the domain, but it’s also to extremize that forecast to the degree that people who normally disagree, agree with each other. And when you have convergence among diverse observers, that’s a signal that the weighted average composite is probably too conservative and you should extremize. Does the diverse team have a CEO, someone in charge?…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence