Gregory Clark: belief

Transcript context

…Clarkian. No, no. This is a widespread misinterpretation of Malthus, that Malthus is about low living standards. I think my earlier book, A Farewell to Alms — one of the actual innovative elements of that book was to say, “Let’s take apart these two different elements of Malthusianism. ” One is the element that you’re forced to an equilibrium where the birth rate equals the death rate. The second is that that equilibrium does not necessarily imply relatively low living standards. The way this shows up is, after the Black Death in Europe, which increased mortality rates, living standards in somewhere like Britain in 1450 were not again equal till the end of the Industrial Revolution. But you could tell this was a static population in England at that period. There were tiny numbers of people. There were less than 2 million people in England by 1450. It was consequently a Malthusian economy, but an incredibly rich Malthusian economy, where people, when they talked about their diet, they talked about the daily meat that they would eat. So, they really were living at high material living standards. We can go back and look at the houses they constructed in that period. People here in Arlington would be happy to move into some of these medieval houses. [laughs] Under your current view, is foreign aid to sub-Saharan Africa counterproductive? I’m not talking about corruption or siphoning it off. Those are clearly problems but just aid as a brute, abstract concept. Does it counteract itself through Malthusian, or what I would call Clarkian mechanisms? I think you used to believe that.…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.