Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedDwarkesh Patel: belief
28 Mar 2024 Dwarkesh Podcast Sholto Douglas & Trenton Bricken — How LLMs actually think
“I'll give you a specific example. I think one of your updates put it as “persona lock-in.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Dwarkesh Patel
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 28 Mar 2024
- Publisher
- Dwarkesh Podcast
Transcript context
…Well publicly, one of the ones that we shared in our update. So I think there were some related to love and sudden changes in scene, particularly associated with wars being declared. There are a few of them in that post, if you want to link to it. But even Bruno Olshausen had a paper back in 2018, 2019, where they applied a similar technique to a BERT model and found that as you go to deeper layers of the model, things become more abstract. So I remember in the earlier layers, there'd be a feature that would just fire for the word “park.” But later on there was a feature that fired for “park” as a last name, like Lincoln Park, it's a common Korean last name as well. And then there was a separate feature that would fire for parks as grassy areas. So there's other work that points in this direction. What do you think we'll learn about human psychology from the interpretability stuff? I'll give you a specific example. I think one of your updates put it as “persona lock-in. ” You remember Sydney Bing or whatever it's locked into. I think that was actually quite endearing. I thought it's so funny. I'm glad it's back in Copilot.…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.