Evidence receipt / evaluation
Published · transcript-backedChris Kempes: evaluation
25 Oct 2025 Machine Learning Street Talk The Universal Hierarchy of Life - Prof. Chris Kempes [SFI]
“in some way by giving me a little bit of information, but I get to think about that and process it and decide if I wanna integrate on it, integrate it and decide what actions I might wanna take on it. That's all really key, and I think that's sort of the extra sauce of society and culture is that we have a higher rate of transfer, but we also have really good procedures for deciding if we want to allow the transfer or not, right?”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Chris Kempes
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- evaluation
- Recorded
- 25 Oct 2025
- Publisher
- Machine Learning Street Talk
Transcript context
…Yeah, so I think there's sort of different ways to think about that. 1 is, there is a whole lot of lateral transfer that can happen across the tree of life in lots of different ways, right. So even in bacteria, can have these lateral gene transfers where you can move bits of genome from 1 genome to another, so you can discover something in 1 lineage and then bring it over to another lineage, that's great. There's this whole other process of just good old fashioned convergence, which is an old idea, and it just says that in certain cases, there are targets for a function that if you achieve that function, it's likely to look a certain way, and so you see similar solutions across the tree of life, right? So we get many origins of the eye, right? So you can imagine, like, the eye is so complicated, maybe it only gets discovered once, and then everything that has an eye has a common ancestor. Not true. Eyes evolve many times. There are differences in the details of eyes in terms of how exactly they see and how they're constructed and slightly what they're made of and so forth, but in some notion, they're all doing the same sort of physics. So that's the convergent bit, right? And the convergent bit is because the physics is a target, right? We understand that, you know, there's, as is happening to both of us right now, certain ways to focus light and obtain a picture at a distance and so forth, and so that's really the target for convergence. So I think there are 2 things happening in lineages. Sometimes it gets discovered in 1 lineage and transferred, and the other is just something is so predicted by physics that if the function happens, it will look a certain way, even if some of the details are different. I think what's really interesting about human society is that we're really, really good at the transfer bit, right? And so for example, you can have things discovered in entirely different cultures with different languages, and sometimes those get, things like agriculture get discovered multiple times, that's maybe more of a convergent thing, but then there's other cases where you have some really neat thing discovered in 1 part of human society, and then it can just immediately propagate to the rest, right? Because our genomes for in taking and taking on information or rejecting it are really flexible. I mean, genome is very abstracted, in our sort of cultural genomes, right, and because that process is if you tell me an idea, I can filter it, think about it, decide if I wanna integrate it and so forth, right? So it's, you might try to, you know, mutate my mind in some way by giving me a little bit of information, but I get to think about that and process it and decide if I wanna integrate on it, integrate it and decide what actions I might wanna take on it. in some way by giving me a little bit of information, but I get to think about that and process it and decide if I wanna integrate on it, integrate it and decide what actions I might wanna take on it. That's all really key, and I think that's sort of the extra sauce of society and culture is that we have a higher rate of transfer, but we also have really good procedures for deciding if we want to allow the transfer or not, right? If I tell you a bad idea, you might remember it for 0 seconds, right? And that's important. And does the convergence happen at multiple levels? So you know, just with this hierarchy that you proposed in mind, I can understand how the principle of least action or something will give rise to the convergence of certain patterns in different parts of the phylogeny. And then perhaps at the at the optimization level, we we might have a higher level of of, you know, more abstract form of convergence in different parts of the phylogeny. But I suppose what I'm driving to here is, do you think that there could be some some kind of information phylogeny which can eventually transcend the material substrate? Know, what does it resemble a basin of attraction where patterns can't really sort of migrate to very different materials? Or do you think there's something higher level going on which really allows patterns to move around?…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.