High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / evaluation

Published · transcript-backed

Mark Huang: evaluation

30 May 2024 Latent Space How to train a Million Context LLM — with Mark Huang of Gradient.ai

“Because nothing against submitting research papers to like ICLR or ICML, knowing the state of the art, those are like six months late, right?”

— Mark Huang

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Mark Huang
Attribution
Verified speaker
Claim type
evaluation
Recorded
30 May 2024
Publisher
Latent Space

Transcript context

…I'll tell you why. Most of the fastest moving research that's being done out there, it's mostly on Twitter. I wasn't a power Twitter user at all before three years ago, but I had to use it and I had to always check it in order to keep on top of early work that people wanted to talk about or present. Because nothing against submitting research papers to like ICLR or ICML, knowing the state of the art, those are like six months late, right? People have already dropped it on archive or they're just openly talking about it. And then being on Discord to see when the rubber hits the road, right? The implementations and the practices that are being done or the data sets, like you said. A lot of conversations about really good data sets and how do you construct them are done in the open in figuring that out. For people that don't have budgets of like $10 million, you just pay a bunch of annotators. So my routine daily is like, second thing I do when I wake up is to look on Twitter to see what the latest updates are from specific people that do really, really great work. Armin at Meta who did the chameleon paper, everything he writes on Twitter is like gold. So anytime he writes something there, I really try to figure out what he's actually saying there and then tie it to techniques and research papers out there. And then sometimes I try to use certain tools. I myself use AI itself to search for the latest papers on a specific topic, if that's the thing, on the top of my mind. And at the end of the day, trying out the products too. I think if you do not try out the tooling and some of the products out there, you are missing out on someone's compression algorithm. Like they compressed all the research out there and all the thought and all the state of the art into a product that they're trying to create for you. And then really backing out and reverse engineering what it took to build something like that. That's huge, right? If you can actually understand perplexity, for instance, you'll already be well ahead on the research. Oh, by the way, you mentioned what is a good perplexity score? There's just a number, right? It's like five to eight or something. Do you have a number in mind when you said that? Yeah.…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence