High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / belief

Published · transcript-backed

Speaker unverified: belief

17 Mar 2026 Cheeky Pint Creating prediction markets (and suing the CFTC) with Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara

“If you're a CEO of a public company and you announce something and it just keeps going down, you're like, "Maybe I'm wrong." And I think the same thing you see with politicians where you can see in the live debate, if they say some answers and they see their prices going lower, they're like, "Well, maybe the answers aren't great.”

— Speaker unverified

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Speaker unverified
Attribution
Not verified from this transcript
Claim type
belief
Recorded
17 Mar 2026
Publisher
Cheeky Pint

Transcript context

…I think that maybe the simple frame for this is you are increasing market efficiency for all these questions. That's what's happening. It's including potentially some events or things that relate to maybe private companies. And I was just thinking about the question, it's an interesting question, why do companies go public? Why is it important to get a real-time market price? Because there are downsides. Sometimes markets are erratic. Sometimes they overshoot in either direction. But the market on the long enough time horizon is a good sort of allocator. It's a good weighing mechanism. It's a good allocator of capital. And I don't really see that... I just think that pricing a lot of these questions will just increase efficiency. Make our function, our allocating function better over time. And there will be some net losers. Like some people that maybe capital shouldn't be allocated to. It's also a good feedback loop. If you're a CEO of a public company and you announce something and it just keeps going down, you're like, "Maybe I'm wrong." And I think the same thing you see with politicians where you can see in the live debate, if they say some answers and they see their prices going lower, they're like, "Well, maybe the answers aren't great. " And I think a lot of these things, when we see even the, for example, the use case of prediction markets in government, a lot of it is conditional markets. They can say, if we pass this bill, will unemployment go up or down? And you can price these things for better decision-making and just like a tighter feedback loop tied with good incentives. Do you guys feel like we have started to see... Like, clearly we have seen the effects of social media on politics, where politics is a different game now. And different politicians are popular and the political discourse is changed by the existence of first Twitter and now to some extent short-form video. Do you guys feel like we have seen the effects on politics of prediction markets yet?…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence