Sara Walker: belief

Transcript context

…But it gives you an intuition if you look at a 1D or two cellular automata, it allows you to build an intuition of how you can have complexity emerge from very simple beginnings, very simple initial conditions- I think that’s the intuition that people have derived from it. The intuition I get from cellular automata is that the flat space of an initial condition in a fixed dynamical law is not rich enough to describe an open-ended generation process. The way I see cellular automata is they’re embedded slices in a much larger causal structure. If you want to look at a deterministic slice of that causal structure, you might be able to extract a set of consistent rules that you might call a cellular automata, but you could embed them as much larger space that’s not dynamical and is about the causal structure and relations between all of those computations. That would be the space cellular automata live in. I think that’s the space that Stephen is talking about when he talks about his ruliad and these hypergraphs of all these possible computations. But I wouldn’t take that as my base reality because I think again, computation itself, this abstract property computation, is not at the base of reality. Can we just linger on that ruliad?…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.