Evidence receipt / uncertainty
Published · transcript-backedShawn Wang: uncertainty
8 Jan 2026 Latent Space Artificial Analysis: Independent LLM Evals as a Service — with George Cameron and Micah-Hill Smith
“I don’t know. Maybe it might be though. You put it like a JSON field, say, say confidence and maybe it spits out something.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Shawn Wang
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- uncertainty
- Recorded
- 8 Jan 2026
- Publisher
- Latent Space
Transcript context
…On that. And one reason that we didn’t do that is because. Or put that into this index is that we think that the, the way to do that is not to ask the models how confident they are. I don’t know. Maybe it might be though. You put it like a JSON field, say, say confidence and maybe it spits out something. Yeah. You know, we have done a few evils podcasts over the, over the years. And when we did one with Clementine of hugging face, who maintains the open source leaderboard, and this was one of her top requests, which is some kind of hallucination slash lack of confidence calibration thing. And so, Hey, this is one of them. And I mean, like anything that we do, it’s not a perfect metric or the whole story of everything that you think about as hallucination. But yeah, it’s pretty useful and has some interesting results. Like one of the things that we saw in the hallucination rate is that anthropics Claude models at the, the, the very left-hand side here with the lowest hallucination rates out of the models that we’ve evaluated amnesty is on. That is an interesting fact. I think it probably correlates with a lot of the previously, not really measured vibes stuff that people like about some of the Claude models. Is the dataset public or what’s is it, is there a held out set? There’s a hell of a set for this one. So we, we have published a public test set, but we we’ve only published 10% of it. The reason is that for this one here specifically, it would be very, very easy to like have data contamination because it is just factual knowledge questions. We would. We’ll update it at a time to also prevent that, but with yeah, kept most of it held out so that we can keep it reliable for a long time. It leads us to a bunch of really cool things, including breakdown quite granularly by topic. And so we’ve got some of that disclosed on the website publicly right now, and there’s lots more coming in terms of our ability to break out very specific topics. Yeah.…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.