High Signal Podcasts Evidence ledger
Method
Browse
← Back to evidence

Evidence receipt / belief

Published · transcript-backed

Jeff Dean: belief

12 Feb 2025 Dwarkesh Podcast Jeff Dean & Noam Shazeer — 25 years at Google: from PageRank to AGI

“I think one thing people should be aware of is that the improvements from generation to generation of these models often are partially driven by hardware and larger scale, but equally and perhaps even more so driven by major algorithmic improvements and major changes in the model architecture, the training data mix, and so on, that really makes the model better per flop that is applied to the model, so I think that's a good realization.”

— Jeff Dean

Source trail

Everything needed to verify it.

Speaker
Jeff Dean
Attribution
Verified speaker
Claim type
belief
Recorded
12 Feb 2025
Publisher
Dwarkesh Podcast

Transcript context

…It's a good question, because I don't know that folks haven't been doing that as much. We definitely have lots of great ideas coming along. Everyone seems to want to run their experiment at maximum scale, but I think that's a human problem. It's very helpful to have a 1/1000th scale problem and then vet 100,000 ideas on that, and then scale up the ones that seem promising. I think one thing people should be aware of is that the improvements from generation to generation of these models often are partially driven by hardware and larger scale, but equally and perhaps even more so driven by major algorithmic improvements and major changes in the model architecture, the training data mix, and so on, that really makes the model better per flop that is applied to the model, so I think that's a good realization. Then I think if we have automated exploration of ideas, we'll be able to vet a lot more ideas and bring them into the actual production training for next generations of these models. That's going to be really helpful because that's sort of what we're currently doing with a lot of brilliant machine learning researchers: looking at lots of ideas, winnowing ones that seem to work well at small scale, seeing if they work well at medium scale, bringing them into larger scale experiments, and then settling on adding a whole bunch of new and interesting things to the final model recipe. If we can do that 100 times faster through those machine learning researchers just gently steering a more automated search process, rather than hand-babysitting lots of experiments themselves, that's going to be really, really good. The one thing that doesn't speed up is experiments at the largest scale. You still end up doing these N = 1 experiments. Really, you just try to put a bunch of brilliant people in the room, have them stare at the thing, and figure out why this is working, why this is not working.…

Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.

Search evidence