Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedShawn Wang: belief
17 Mar 2026 Latent Space Why Anthropic Thinks AI Should Have Its Own Computer — Felix Rieseberg of Claude Cowork & Claude Code Desktop
“I think you guys do something different in planning, but, uh, I’ve been talking with Tariq who is on the cloud co team, and you guys are, he’s like, no, we just exposed planning.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Shawn Wang
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 17 Mar 2026
- Publisher
- Latent Space
Transcript context
…right? Yeah. Uh, you don’t actually have to read the code again. I, I’m still like on a sort of like a definitional thing. Um, can we build a good mental model of Claude Cowork? Um, this is what I have, right? Like you you said it’s like fundamentally cloud co. We don’t wanna touch it. There’s the cloud app, there’s clouding Chrome. I think you guys do something different in planning, but, uh, I’ve been talking with Tariq who is on the cloud co team, and you guys are, he’s like, no, we just exposed planning. Maybe we can clarify like, what are the major pieces. That people should be aware. It goes into cowork, like, okay, I think you basically have them. So really, um, you can, you can take planning more or less out. I think there’s a few things that are really valuable in cowork. Um, the virtual machine is probably the most powerful thing. So we currently run like a, we currently run like a lightweight VM and we put clocked out into the vm and we do that for, for, um, a number of reasons. Safety and security is a big one, but even if you, even if you ignore for a second safety and security and you’re just like, okay, Yolo, I want this thing to do whatever. It is quite powerful to give Claus on computer that is like generally a good idea. And in terms of architecture and UX and everything else that we’ve been working on, philanthropic, it often is quite useful for you to like anthropomorphize, um, clot aggressively and just be like, this is a person. What will you do if you give a, if you had a person, right? Yeah. And the analogy I’ve given my dad this morning who is still like quite insistent on using chat even for like coding things, is if you were a developer and your employer told you that you don’t need a computer, they’re just gonna like, send you emails with a code and you send emails with code back like that, maybe work for Patrick Miles in the back, but that it’s not very effective. Um, so what we can do with the VM is because it’s a, it’s a Linux system, Claude Code has more or less free reign to install whatever needs to install. It can install Python, it can install no js. We do have strict network ingress and egress controls. So you can still, as, as a user in like plain human language, make it clear to, to the entire system what you’re okay with and what you’re not okay with. But at no point do we have to ask a real person, like a, like a person who might be in marketing or a lawyer. I’d have to go to a lawyer and be like, are you okay with me installing Homebrew?…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.