Evidence receipt / belief
Published · transcript-backedNeal Stephenson: belief
13 Nov 2024 Conversations with Tyler Neal Stephenson on History, Spycraft, and American-Soviet Parallels
“I think there’s a scattershot phenomenon going on, where a science fiction book might include a large number of hypothetical inventions, and the ones that are in there might be described somewhat vaguely.”
Source trail
Everything needed to verify it.
- Speaker
- Neal Stephenson
- Attribution
- Verified speaker
- Claim type
- belief
- Recorded
- 13 Nov 2024
- Publisher
- Conversations with Tyler
Transcript context
…I have a long question from a reader, which I’ll paraphrase. It basically says, “You seem to be better at predicting the future than almost anyone else, and you’ve done this in a wide variety of areas. What’s your self-awareness as to how this has been possible?” I think there’s a scattershot phenomenon going on, where a science fiction book might include a large number of hypothetical inventions, and the ones that are in there might be described somewhat vaguely. A bunch of those might never get realized, but people very generously tend to forget about those. They give the writer, the novelist, a free pass, and they only take into account the ones that seem to have come true. There’s also some generosity there in that the description of the invention might be a little wishy-washy, a little vague. Then later on, when a somewhat similar real invention gets made, someone’s nice enough to say that the science fiction writer invented this. Say the primer from Diamond Age — do you feel we have that now or soon with large language models? They will teach you almost anything, right? Not how to make a bomb, but anything scientific, anything legitimate. They’ll give you multiple-choice questions. They’ll grade them for you. They’re not perfect, but is that, in fact, what you meant?…
Stored transcript either side of the excerpt. The highlighted words are the published quote; the surrounding text is unedited source, never generated.